6533b82cfe1ef96bd128ec0a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

In vitro comparison of flexural strength and elastic modulus of three provisional crown materials used in fixed prosthodontics

Rohit RaghavanBasavaraj S. SalagundiVachan PoonachaP L RupeshSeema Poonacha

subject

Universal testing machineMaterials sciencemedicine.medical_treatmentResearchComposite numberFixed prosthodonticstechnology industry and agricultureOdontologíaMethacrylate:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Ciencias de la saludCrown (dentistry)chemistry.chemical_compoundFlexural strengthchemistrystomatognathic systemClinical and Experimental DentistryUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASmedicineComposite materialMethyl methacrylateGeneral DentistryElastic modulus

description

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the flexural strength and the elastic moduli of three provisional crown materials (methyl methacrylate based autopolymerized resin, bis acryl composite based autopolymerized resin and urethane dimethacrylate based light polymerized resin) after storing in artificial saliva and testing at intervals of 24 hours and 7 days. Study design: A metal master mould with four slots of dimensions 25x2x2 mm was fabricated to obtain samples of standard dimensions. A total of 135 specimens were thus obtained with 45 each of three provisional materials. Further 15 samples of each group were tested after storing for one hour at room temperature and again at intervals of 24 hours and 7 days after storing in artificial saliva. Three point flexural tests were carried out in the universal testing machine to calculate the flexural strength and the elastic modulus. The changes were calculated and data was analyzed with Fisher’s test and ANOVA. Results: The flexural strength of the methyl methacrylate resin reduced significantly while bis-acrylic composite resin showed a significant increase in its flexural strength after storing in artificial saliva for 24 hours and the values of both remained constant thereafter. Contrary to these findings, light polymerized resin showed a significant decrease in flexural strength after storing in artificial saliva for 24 hours and then significantly increased in flexural strength after 7 days. However the changes in the values for elastic modulus of respective materials were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Methacrylate based autopolymerizing resin showed the highest flexural strength and elastic moduli after fabrication and after storing in artificial saliva and for 24 hours and 7 days. Bis-acrylic composite resin showed the least flexural strength and elastic moduli. Key words:Provisional restorations, interim restorations, Methyl Methacrylate, composite restoration, flexural strength, elastic moduli.

http://hdl.handle.net/10550/35359