6533b82cfe1ef96bd128ec80

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Clock'N Test as a Possible Measure of Emotions: Normative Data Collected on a Non-clinical Population.

Auriane GrosAuriane GrosSophie GuilleminValeria ManeraYannick BéjotAnaïs DaumasOlivier RouaudMaurice GiroudMartine Lemesle Martin

subject

priming effectmedicine.medical_specialtyFacial expressionCognitive NeurosciencePoststroke apathyTime perceptionAudiology050105 experimental psychologyDevelopmental psychologytime estimation03 medical and health sciencesBehavioral Neuroscience0302 clinical medicineskin conductancemedicine0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesAttentionReactivity (psychology)Parkinsons-diseaseIndividual-differencesOriginal ResearchFacial expressionmedicine.diagnostic_test05 social sciencesMild cognitive impairmentNeuropsychological testTime perceptionTest (assessment)Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyInternal clockConvergent validity[ SDV.NEU ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]LateralityAlzheimers-diseaseemotional disordersneuropsychological test[SDV.NEU]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]PsychologyPriming (psychology)Self-report030217 neurology & neurosurgeryNeuroscience

description

International audience; Objective: At present emotional experience and implicit emotion regulation (IER) abilities are mainly assessed though self -reports, which are subjected to several biases. The aim of the present studies was to validate the Clock'N test, a recently developed time estimation task employing emotional priming to assess implicitly emotional reactivity and IER. Methods: In Study 1, the Clock' N test was administered to 150 healthy participants with different age, laterality and gender, in order to ascertain whether these factors affected the test results. In phase 1 participant were asked to judge the duration of seven sounds. In phase 2, before judging the duration of the same sounds, participants were presented with short arousing video -clip used as emotional priming stimuli. Time warp was calculated as the difference in time estimation between phase 2 and phase 1, and used to assess how emotions affected subjective time estimations. In study 2, a representative sample was selected to provide normative scores to be employed to assess emotional reactivity (Score 1) and IER (Score 2), and to calculate statistical cutoffs, based on the 10th and 90th score distribution percentiles. Results: Converging with previous findings, the results of study 1 suggested that the Clock'N test can be employed to assess both emotional reactivity, as indexed by an initial time underestimation, and IER, as indexed by a progressive shift to time overestimation. No effects of gender, age and laterality were found. Conclusions: These results suggest that the Clock'N test is adapted to assess emotional reactivity and IER. After collection of data on the test discriminant and convergent validity, this test may be employed to assess deficits in these abilities in different clinical populations.

10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00008https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26903825