6533b82cfe1ef96bd128f5e6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparison of conventional hamstring/quadriceps ratio between genders in level-matched soccer players

Luis-millán GonzálezR. Cabeza-ruizR. ArandaM. Pellicer-chenollA. PardoPilar Serra-añó

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyIsokinetic strengthlcsh:Special situations and conditionsKnee flexionlcsh:MedicineFutebolIsometric exerciseConcentricFútbol03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineMuscular imbalanceStrength ratiosPhysiology (medical)SoccerMedicineEccentricOrthopedics and Sports MedicineRiesgo de lesiónlcsh:Sports medicineRatios de fuerzaDesequilibrio muscularOrthodontics030222 orthopedicsFuerza isocinéticabusiness.industrylcsh:RC952-1245Risco de lesõeslcsh:R030229 sport sciencesRelações de forçaMomento de forçaTorqueMomento de fuerzaPhysical therapyDesequilíbrio muscularForça isocinéticaInjury risklcsh:RC1200-1245businessHamstring

description

Abstract Objectives The main goal of our study is to compare the hamstring/quadriceps ( H / Q ) ratio at different knee angles between level-matched male and female soccer players and to determine whether differences in the H / Q ratio exist between the dominant and the non-dominant leg. Methods A cross-sectional study design was used to compare an isometric H / Q ratio and functional isokinetic ratio (between hamstring in eccentric contraction and quadriceps in concentric contraction) between males ( n  = 14) and females ( n  = 14). These ratios were studied at two different speeds of movement (60° s −1 and 180° s −1 ) and in five different positions (40°, 50°, 60°, 70° and 80° degrees of knee flexion). Results Our results showed no differences in the H / Q ratio between genders. The ratio in the dominant leg showed an average of 9% higher values. The ratios were an average of 53.4% lower in positions near flexion than in positions near extension. Conclusions For both men and women, the results showed lower ratios in the non-dominant leg compared to the dominant leg. At higher velocities, the force ratios were higher, while in more knee-flexed positions, the ratios were lower. Finally, we did not find differences in ratios between men and women.

10.1016/j.ramd.2015.05.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ramd.2015.05.002