6533b82dfe1ef96bd1290a12

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cognitive estimation: Performance of patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions

Natasja Van-harskampEdgar ChanLisa CipolottiSarah E. MacphersonSara GharooniTim ShalliceTim ShalliceParashkev Nachev

subject

MaleRAPM Raven's Advanced Progressive MatricesNo NumberNeuropsychological TestsAudiologyPrefrontal cortexBrain mappingDevelopmental psychologyCVA cerebrovascular accidentExecutive functionsBehavioral NeurosciencePFC prefrontal cortex0302 clinical medicineBrain Injuries TraumaticImage Processing Computer-AssistedPrefrontal cortexprefrontal cortexBrain Mapping05 social sciencesGNT Graded Naming TestNeuropsychologyCognitionMiddle Agedexecutive functionsExecutive functionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingFrontal Lobefluid IntelligenceFrontal lobeFemaleAnalysis of varianceFluid intelligencePsychologyAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyCognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCognitive estimation testCognitive Estimation TestArticle050105 experimental psychology03 medical and health sciencesNeuroimagingmedicineHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesAgedAnalysis of VarianceHC healthy comparisonsIQ Intelligence QuotientCognition DisordersNART National Adult Reading Test030217 neurology & neurosurgeryLF left frontal

description

The Cognitive Estimation Test (CET) is a widely used test to investigate estimation abilities requiring complex processes such as reasoning, the development and application of appropriate strategies, response plausibility checking as well as general knowledge and numeracy (e.g., Shallice and Evans, 1978; MacPherson et al., 2014). Thus far, it remains unknown whether the CET is both sensitive and specific to frontal lobe dysfunction. Neuroimaging techniques may not represent a useful methodology for answering this question since the complex processes involved are likely to be associated with a large network of brain regions, some of which are not functionally necessary to successfully carry out the CET. Instead, neuropsychological studies may represent a more promising investigation tool for identifying the brain areas necessary for CET performance. We recently developed two new versions of the CET (CET-A and CET-B; MacPherson et al., 2014). We investigated the overall performance and conducted an error analysis on CET-A in patients with focal, unilateral, frontal (n = 38) or posterior (n = 22) lesions and healthy controls (n = 39). We found that frontal patients’ performance was impaired compared to healthy controls on CET. We also found that frontal patients generated significantly poorer estimates than posterior patients on CET-A. This could not be explained by impairments in fluid intelligence. The error analyses suggested that for CET-A, extreme and very extreme responses are impaired following frontal lobe damage. However, only very extreme responses are significantly more impaired following frontal lobe than posterior damage and so represent a measure restricted to frontal “executive” impairment, in addition to overall CET performance.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.017