6533b82dfe1ef96bd1290a6e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy versus budesonide/formoterol for the treatment of asthma: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of efficacy and safety.
Sanjeeva DissanayakeRoland BuhlKay SpoonerBeatrix BalintMark LomaxAnna Bodzenta-lukaszyksubject
Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineBudesonideAdultMaleAdolescentFluticasone propionateYoung AdultDouble-Blind Methodimmune system diseasesForced Expiratory VolumeFormoterol FumarateAdministration InhalationImmunology and AllergyMedicineHumansBudesonideFluticasoneAgedbusiness.industryInhalerDry Powder Inhalersrespiratory systemMiddle AgedAsthmarespiratory tract diseasesBronchodilator AgentsAndrostadienesDrug CombinationsBudesonide/formoterolEthanolaminesAnesthesiaPediatrics Perinatology and Child HealthSalbutamolFluticasoneFormoterol FumarateFemaleFormoterolbusinesshormones hormone substitutes and hormone antagonistscirculatory and respiratory physiologymedicine.drugdescription
The inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (fluticasone) and the long-acting β₂ agonist formoterol fumarate (formoterol) have been combined in a single aerosol inhaler fluticasone/formoterol (flutiform(®)). This study compared the efficacy and safety of fluticasone/formoterol with the combination product budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort(®) Turbohaler(®)).A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, Phase 3 study comprising a 7- (± 3) day screening, 2-4-week run-in, and 12-week treatment periods. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate to severe persistent asthma for ≥ 6 months before screening and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) 50-80% predicted and ≥ 15% reversibility following salbutamol inhalation were randomized to fluticasone/formoterol 250/10 μg twice daily (n = 140) or budesonide/formoterol 400/12 μg twice daily (n = 139).Fluticasone/formoterol was comparable to budesonide/formoterol with respect to the primary endpoint, change in pre-dose FEV₁ from baseline to Week 12. The LS mean treatment difference was -0.044 L, with a lower 95% confidence interval (CI) greater than the pre-defined non-inferiority limit of -0.2 L (95% CI: -0.130, 0.043 L; p0.001). Non-inferiority was also demonstrated for the secondary endpoints mean change in FEV₁ from baseline (pre-dose) to 2 hours post-dose at Week 12, and discontinuations due to lack of efficacy. Similar results were obtained for both treatment groups for all other secondary endpoints. Fluticasone/formoterol had a good safety profile that was comparable with budesonide/formoterol.This study demonstrated comparable efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol to budesonide/formoterol in terms of the primary endpoint, change in pre-dose FEV₁ from baseline to Week 12. This was supported by comparable results for both treatments for all secondary endpoints.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2012-10-26 | The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma |