6533b82dfe1ef96bd12913a1
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Moral Cognition and Multiple Sclerosis: A Neuropsychological Study
Giuseppe SalemiRiccardo MeliPaolo RagoneseChiara CeramiAlessandra DodichSabrina RealmutoNicola Canessasubject
AdultMale050103 clinical psychologymedia_common.quotation_subjectMoral cognitionEmotionsTheory of MindMoral judgmentEmpathyNeuropsychological TestsMoralsMultiple sclerosisJudgmentYoung AdultCognitionMultiple Sclerosis Relapsing-RemittingSocial cognitionTheory of mindmedicineHumans0501 psychology and cognitive scienceshealth care economics and organizationsmedia_commonEmotions/emotional processing05 social sciencesNeuropsychologyCognitionGeneral MedicineEmotional detachmenthumanitiesPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyCase-Control StudiesFemaleSettore MED/26 - Neurologiamedicine.symptomEmpathyPsychologyAttributionStroop effectClinical psychologydescription
Objectives Recent literature proved that social cognition impairments may characterize the neuropsychological profile of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. However, little is still known about moral cognition in MS. In this study, we evaluated non-social, social, and moral cognitive performances in 45 relapsing-remitting MS patients. Methods Patients underwent the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis battery, the Cognitive Estimation and Stroop tasks, the Ekman-60 Faces test, the Reading the Mind in the Eye and Story-based Empathy task. Additionally, a task of moral dilemmas including both "instrumental" and "incidental" conditions was administered to patients. Forty-five age-, gender- and education-matched healthy control subjects (HC) were enrolled for comparisons. Results The majority of patients (i.e., 77.6%) showed deficits at non-social tasks, particularly in the executive domains. A subset of MS sample (i.e., 24%) presented with emotion recognition and socio-affective processing impairments. Overall, MS patients showed comparable levels of moral judgment with respect to HC. The rate of yes/no response in resolution of moral dilemmas and scores of attribution of emotional valence were comparable between groups. Nevertheless, lower moral permissibility and emotional arousal, particularly for the instrumental dilemmas, characterized the MS profile. Significant correlations between the attribution of emotional valence to moral actions and mentalizing scores emerged. Conclusions Our findings expand current literature on MS supporting not only deficits in executive and socio-emotional domains but also low levels of permissibility of immoral actions and emotional detachment in the moral judgment process.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-07-05 |