6533b82dfe1ef96bd129151a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

When more is less: the fitness consequences of predators attacking more unpalatable prey when more are presented

Michael P. SpeedElizabeth M. WileyHannah M. RowlandJohanna MappesGraeme D. Ruxton

subject

Food ChainBehavior AnimalEcologyGallus gallus domesticusBiologyAgricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)Models BiologicalMüllerian mimicryPredationFood chainPredatory behaviorPredatory BehaviorMimicryAnimalsLearningAnimal BehaviourFemaleGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesPredatorChickens

description

In 1879, Fritz Müller hypothesized that mimetic resemblance in which defended prey display the same warning signal would share the costs of predator education. Although Müller argued that predators would need to ingest a fixed number of prey with a given visual signal when learning to avoid unpalatable prey, this assumption lacks empirical support. We report an experiment which shows that, as the number of unpalatable prey presented to them increased, avian predators attacked higher numbers of those prey. We calculated that, when predators increase attacks, the fitness costs incurred by unpalatable prey can be substantial. This suggests that the survival benefits of mimicry could be lower than Müller proposed. An important finding is, however, that these costs decline in importance as the total number of available prey increases.

10.1098/rsbl.2010.0207https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-C6DF-D11858/00-001M-0000-002D-C6E2-311858/00-001M-0000-002D-C6E1-511858/00-001M-0000-002D-C6E3-1