6533b82dfe1ef96bd129154a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Phonological-Lexical Feedback during Early Abstract Encoding: The Case of Deaf Readers.

Marta Vergara-martínezAna MarcetManuel Perea

subject

AdultMaleAdolescentNominal identityConcept Formationmedia_common.quotation_subjectlcsh:MedicineDeafnessBiology050105 experimental psychologyFeedbackYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineEvent-related potentialConcept learningReading (process)Reaction TimeHumansEncoding (semiotics)0501 psychology and cognitive scienceslcsh:Sciencemedia_commonMultidisciplinary05 social scienceslcsh:RPhonologyMiddle AgedPersons With Hearing ImpairmentsReadingWord recognitionFemalelcsh:QPriming (psychology)030217 neurology & neurosurgeryResearch ArticleCognitive psychology

description

In the masked priming technique, physical identity between prime and target enjoys an advantage over nominal identity in nonwords (GEDA-GEDA faster than geda-GEDA). However, nominal identity overrides physical identity in words (e.g., REAL-REAL similar to real-REAL). Here we tested whether the lack of an advantage of the physical identity condition for words was due to top-down feedback from phonological-lexical information. We examined this issue with deaf readers, as their phonological representations are not as fully developed as in hearing readers. Results revealed that physical identity enjoyed a processing advantage over nominal identity not only in nonwords but also in words (GEDA-GEDA faster than geda-GEDA; REAL-REAL faster than real-REAL). This suggests the existence of fundamental differences in the early stages of visual word recognition of hearing and deaf readers, possibly related to the amount of feedback from higher levels of information.

10.1371/journal.pone.0146265http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4711662?pdf=render