6533b82dfe1ef96bd1291592

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Can immunohistochemical biomarkers distinguish epithelial dysplasia degrees in actinic cheilitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bruno MatuckJefferson-da-rocha TenorioMariana Minatel BragaThalita Santana

subject

Epithelial dysplasiamedicine.medical_specialtyUltraviolet RaysReviewLip Neoplasm03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineMedicineHumansGeneral DentistryRetrospective StudiesOral Medicine and Pathologybusiness.industryActinic cheilitisRetrospective cohort study030206 dentistrymedicine.disease:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]DermatologyCritical appraisalOtorhinolaryngologyCheilitisMeta-analysisLip NeoplasmsUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASBiomarker (medicine)SurgerybusinessBiomarkersCohort study

description

Background Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a poten-tially malignant disorder of the lip, characterized by epithelial and connective tissue alterations caused by chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation. In the past decades, diverse studies have been conducted in lip carcinogenesis and many biomarkers have been identified in lip lesions, yet there is no scientific evidence that determines its usefulness in the clinical setting or in histopatho-logical routine. Therefore, we conducted the first systematic review in this field to summarize the results of published studies on immunohistochemical bi-omarkers in lip carcinogenesis, to evaluate if there is a marker than can distin-guish the different histological grades of AC. Material and Methods Retrospective stud-ies that investigated immunohistochemical biomarkers in AC defined on standardised histological assessment were gathered from five databases and evaluated. Each study was qualitatively evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Tools from SUMARI. Results The proliferation marker Ki-67 was the most studied biomarker and we observed, through meta-analysis, that it was differently expressed between AC and lip cancer, but not in AC sub-groups. Most articles had a high risk of bias. Conclusions In summary, the literature lacks quality follow up studies in actinic cheilitis. Multi-centre cohort studies, with patients stratified by treatment type and the use of image analysis soft-ware, could be the solution to further address the issues of investigating poten-tially malignant lesions and help change clinical practice, in terms of individu-alizing patients’ treatment and prognosis prediction. Key words:Lip carcinogenesis, actinic cheilitis, lip cancer, bi-omarkers.

10.4317/medoral.23223https://hdl.handle.net/10550/77076