6533b82dfe1ef96bd1291d60

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effects of Eradicating Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients With Cirrhosis Differ With Stage of Portal Hypertension.

Antonio CraxìS. PeraltaF. SimoneGiuseppe CabibboElisabetta ConteVincenza CalvarusoRosaria Maria PipitoneA. AriniDonatella FerraroCalogero CammàVito Di MarcoM.g. BavettaStefania Grimaudo

subject

Liver CirrhosisMaleCirrhosisSustained Virologic ResponseHepacivirusEsophaguGastroenterologyPolyethylene GlycolsLiver diseasechemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineEsophageal varicesProspective StudiesProspective cohort studyHazard ratioGastroenterologyvirus diseasesMiddle AgedPortal PressureHepatitis CRecombinant ProteinsIntention to Treat AnalysisItaly030220 oncology & carcinogenesisHepatocellular carcinoma030211 gastroenterology & hepatologyFemalemedicine.medical_specialtyInterferon alpha-2Lower riskEsophageal and Gastric VaricesAntiviral Agents03 medical and health sciencesInternal medicineHypertension PortalRibavirinmedicineHumansAgedProportional Hazards ModelsHepatologybusiness.industryRibavirinBleedingInterferon-alphaLong-Term Outcomemedicine.diseasedigestive system diseaseschemistrybusinessFollow-Up Studies

description

Clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) via antiviral treatment changes the course of liver disease. We evaluated the benefit of sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with HCV and cirrhosis without (stage 1) and with (stage 2) esophageal varices (EV).We performed a prospective cohort study of 444 patients with HCV and compensated cirrhosis (218 with stage 1 and 226 with stage 2 disease) treated with peg-interferon and ribavirin from June 2001 through December 2009 at the University of Palermo, Italy and followed for a median of 7.6 years (range, 1-12.6 years). We used Cox regression analysis to identify variables associated with appearance or progression of EVs, development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver decompensation, and overall survival.In the intention-to-treat analysis, 67 patients with stage 1 disease (30.7%) and 41 patients with stage 2 disease (18.1%) achieved an SVR (P = .003). Patients with stage 1 disease and an SVR were less likely to develop EVs than stage 1 patients without an SVR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.48; P.001). However, SVR did not affect whether patients with stage 2 disease developed further EVs (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.03; P = .07, by log-rank test). An SVR was associated with lower risk for HCC (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.55; P.001). Patients with stage 2 disease, regardless of SVR, were at greater risk than patients with stage 1 disease for liver decompensation (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.73-4.59; P.001) or death (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12-2.80; P = .015). A lower proportion of patients with stage 1 disease and an SVR died from HCC (2.9%), compared with those without an SVR (11.9%) (P = .03) or developed liver decompensation (none vs 7.1% without an SVR; P = .009). A lower proportion of patients with stage 2 disease and an SVR died from causes secondary to HCC (2.0%) compared with those without an SVR (18.4%) (P = .003). Death from causes secondary to liver decompensation did not differ significantly between patients with stage 2 disease with or without an SVR (12.1% vs 25.4%; P = .15).In a prospective study of 444 patients with HCV and compensated cirrhosis, HCV eradication reduced risk for liver decompensation, HCC, and death, regardless of whether the patients had EVs.

10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.036https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27039970