6533b82efe1ef96bd1292904

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations

Liana BoscoLeonardo Di GregorioGloria CalagnaAlberto FirenzeRosaria SchillaciDaniela PistoiaNicola SerraAntonino PerinoTeresa FascianaMarco VellaGiuseppina Capra

subject

Hpv genotypesSexually transmitted diseaseAdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyScienceDiseasesMicrobiologyArticle03 medical and health sciencesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineMedical researchHuman Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent Types 6 11 16 18Internal medicineMedicineHumansHuman papilloma virus infection030212 general & internal medicinePapillomavirus VaccinesPapillomaviridaeSicilyAgedPotential impactMultidisciplinarybusiness.industryHPV PositivePapillomavirus InfectionsQHealth careRMiddle Aged030220 oncology & carcinogenesisCase-Control StudiesMedicinebusinessSexual contactHPV nonavalent vaccine men infectious desease

description

AbstractHuman papilloma virus infection (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease. Little is known about male infection. Nonavalent vaccine against types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 was approved and neutral gender immunization programs have been proposed. This study evaluates the potential impact of nonavalent vaccine compared to quadrivalent in male living in Sicily (Italy). 58.7% of samples were HPV positive and forty-four types of HPV were identified. A significant higher estimated coverage of nonavalent vaccine than quadrivalent was observed (64.3% vs. 45.8%), with absolute and relative additional impact of 20.1% and 47.2%, respectively. Low impact of the vaccine were calculated as the empirical probability of HPV genotypes 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 alone or in combination; the high impact as empirical probability of HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 genotypes alone or in association with other genotypes. The potential impact of the nonavalent vaccine vs quadrivalent was significant for low and high impact (29.7% > 18:8%; 34:6% > 26.6%, respectively). Particularly, in men with lesions and risky sexual contact was significant only for low impact (35.5% > 29.7%; 31.4% > 19.7%, respectively). In partners with positive females was significant for low impact (26.3% > 15.1%) and high impact (33.7% > 23.2%). Nonavalent vaccine offers broader protection in men with HPV positive partners, who would have a potential role in the transmission of the infection.

10.1038/s41598-021-83639-6http://hdl.handle.net/10447/509369