6533b82efe1ef96bd12931a9
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations.
Gustaf SameliusAlexander KondratyevNatalya A. SokolovaEster Rut UnnsteinsdóttirArild LandaAlice A. StickneyNiels Martin SchmidtBrigitte SabardTuomo OllilaRasmus ErlandssonRolf A. ImsHeikki HenttonenOlivier GilgLiliya DoroninaJukka NiemimaaJames D. RothAleksandr SokolovDorothee EhrichLiya PokrovskayaEva FugleiSiw Turid KillengreenBenoît SittlerHelmut KruckenbergNina E. EideAnna Y. RodnikovaElena KruchenkovaAnders AngerbjörnØYstein FlagstadAnne-mathilde ThierryNikita OvsyanikovJohannes LangKarin NorénPaula A. WhiteM. E. GoltsmanEric BuchelIvan PokrovskyDominique BerteauxIrina E. MenyushinaOlga KulikovaRay T. AlisauskasJulia Mikhnevichsubject
VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480::Ecology: 4880106 biological sciencesVulpesmedia_common.quotation_subjectBiodiversityDistribution (economics):Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480 [VDP]Oceanography010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesCompetition (biology)VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480::Økologi: 488lcsh:Oceanographybiology.animalEarth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)Environmental ChemistryArctic foxlcsh:GC1-158114. Life underwaterlcsh:Environmental sciencesGeneral Environmental Sciencemedia_commonbiodiversity indicatorlcsh:GE1-350biologyEcologybusiness.industryArctic ecosystems010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyCircumpolar star15. Life on landbiology.organism_classificationAlopex lagopusbiodiversity assessmentArctic13. Climate actionLagopusdata management[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecologybusinessprotocol harmonizationdescription
Source at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2017.1319602 The biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council has developed pan-Arctic biodiversity monitoring plans to improve our ability to detect, understand and report on long-term change in Arctic biodiversity. The Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) was identified as a target of future monitoring because of its circumpolar distribution, ecological importance and reliance on Arctic ecosystems. We provide the first exhaustive survey of contemporary Arctic fox monitoring programmes, describing 34 projects located in eight countries. Monitored populations covered equally the four climate zones of the species’ distribution, and there were large differences between populations in long-term trends, multi-annual fluctuations, diet composition, degree of competition with red fox and human interferences. Den density, number of active dens, number of breeding dens and litter size were assessed in almost all populations, while projects varied greatly with respect to monitoring of other variables indicative of population status, ecosystem state or ecosystem function. We review the benefits, opportunities and challenges to increased integration of monitoring projects. We argue that better harmonizing protocols of data collection and data management would allow new questions to be addressed while adding tremendous value to individual projects. However, despite many opportunities, challenges remain. We offer six recommendations that represent decisive progress toward a better integration of Arctic fox monitoring projects. Further, our work serves as a template that can be used to integrate monitoring efforts of other species, thereby providing a key step for future assessments of global biodiversity.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-08-16 |