6533b82efe1ef96bd129344f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Milena SantLucia MangoneRosario TuminoRosa FilibertiPaolo Giorgi RossiGiuliano CarrozziWalter MazzuccoPamela MancusoGiovanna TagliabueSilvia IacovacciPamela Minicozzi

subject

OncologyAdultCancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialtymedicine.medical_treatmentBreast NeoplasmsSettore MED/42 - Igiene Generale E Applicata03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineBreast cancerBreast cancerInternal medicineCancer screeningmedicineBiomarkers TumorOdds RatioMammographyHumans030212 general & internal medicineneoadjuvant therapyNeoadjuvant therapyTriple-negative breast cancerTumor markerCancer stagingAgedNeoplasm StagingAged 80 and overmedicine.diagnostic_testGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseCombined Modality TherapyCancer registryTreatment OutcomeOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisFemalemultidisciplinaryMammography

description

Objective: To evaluate the frequency of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) in women with stage I–III breast cancer in Italy and whether it is influenced by biological characteristics, screening history, and geographic area. Methods: Data from the High Resolution Study conducted in 7 Italian cancer registries were used; they are a representative sample of incident cancers in the study period (2009–2013). Included were 3546 women aged <85 years (groups <50, 50–69, 70–64, and 75+) with stage I–III breast cancer at diagnosis who underwent surgery. Women were classified as receiving NT if they received chemotherapy, target therapy, and/or hormone therapy before the first surgical treatment. Logistic models were built to test the association with biological and contextual variables. Results: Only 8.2% of women (290 cases) underwent NT; the treatment decreases with increasing age (14.5% in age <50 and 2.2% in age 75+), is more frequent in women with negative receptors (14.8%), HER2-positive (15.7%), and triple-negative (15.6%). The multivariable analysis showed the probability of receiving NT is higher in stage III (odds ratio [OR] 3.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.83–5.18), luminal B (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.27–2.76), triple-negatives (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.15–3.08), and in symptomatic cancers (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.13–3.48). Use of NT varied among geographic areas: Reggio Emilia had the highest rates (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.37–3.82) while Palermo had the lowest (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.24–0.68). Conclusions: The use of NT in Italy is limited and variable. There are no signs of greater use in hospitals with more advanced care.

10.1177/0300891619869505http://hdl.handle.net/10447/390029