6533b82ffe1ef96bd129538d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The Principle of Stasis: Why drift is not a Zero-Cause Law
Victor J. Luquesubject
Structure (mathematical logic)HistoryPhilosophy05 social sciences06 humanities and the artsGeneral MedicineBiological evolutionNormal state050905 science studies0603 philosophy ethics and religionBiological EvolutionModels BiologicalZero (linguistics)History and Philosophy of ScienceLaw060302 philosophyMutation (genetic algorithm)Quantitative Biology::Populations and EvolutionEvolutionary systems0509 other social sciencesExplanatory powerEvolutionary theorydescription
This paper analyses the structure of evolutionary theory as a quasi-Newtonian theory and the need to establish a Zero-Cause Law. Several authors have postulated that the special character of drift is because it is the default behaviour or Zero-Cause Law of evolutionary systems, where change and not stasis is the normal state of them. For these authors, drift would be a Zero-Cause Law, the default behaviour and therefore a constituent assumption impossible to change without changing the system. I defend that drift's causal and explanatory power prevents it from being considered as a Zero-Cause Law. Instead, I propose that the default behaviour of evolutionary systems is what I call the Principle of Stasis, which posits that an evolutionary system where there is no selection, drift, mutation, migration, etc., and therefore no difference-maker, will not undergo any change (it will remain in stasis).
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-06-01 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences |