6533b82ffe1ef96bd1295ba9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Constrained SUSY seesaws with a 125 GeV Higgs

Filipe R. JoaquimMartin HirschAvelino Vicente

subject

PhysicsNuclear and High Energy PhysicsGluinoParticle physicsLarge Hadron Collider010308 nuclear & particles physicsHigh Energy Physics::PhenomenologyFOS: Physical sciencesFísicaSupersymmetryParameter space01 natural sciencesHigh Energy Physics - PhenomenologyHigh Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)Seesaw mechanismSeesaw molecular geometry[PHYS.HPHE]Physics [physics]/High Energy Physics - Phenomenology [hep-ph]0103 physical sciencesHiggs bosonHigh Energy Physics::Experiment010306 general physicsBoson

description

Motivated by the ATLAS and CMS discovery of a Higgs-like boson with a mass around 125 GeV, and by the need of explaining neutrino masses, we analyse the three canonical SUSY versions of the seesaw mechanism (type I, II and III) with CMSSM boundary conditions. In type II and III cases, SUSY particles are lighter than in the CMSSM (or the constrained type I seesaw), for the same set of input parameters at the universality scale. Thus, to explain $m_{h^0} \simeq 125 GeV$ at low energies, one is forced into regions of parameter space with very large values of $m_0$, $M_{1/2}$ or $A_0$. We compare the squark and gluino masses allowed by the ATLAS and CMS ranges for $m_{h^0}$ (extracted from the 2011-2012 data), and discuss the possibility of distinguishing seesaw models in view of future results on SUSY searches. In particular, we briefly comment on the discovery potential of LHC upgrades, for squark/gluino mass ranges required by present Higgs mass constraints. A discrimination between different seesaw models cannot rely on the Higgs mass data alone, therefore we also take into account the MEG upper limit on BR$(\mu \to e \gamma)$ and show that, in some cases, this may help to restrict the SUSY parameter space, as well as to set complementary limits on the seesaw scale.

10.1007/jhep11(2012)105https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00722544