6533b82ffe1ef96bd1295bcb

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Activation of angiotensin II type 1 receptors and contractile activity in human sigmoid colon in vitro.

Rosa SerioFlavia MulèGaetano Felice CaldaraMichelangelo AuteriMariangela MastropaoloMaria Grazia ZizzoRosa Liotta

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyPhysiologyPyridinesBiologyPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AInhibitory postsynaptic potentialSettore BIO/09 - FisiologiaReceptor Angiotensin Type 2Muscle Smooth VascularReceptor Angiotensin Type 1Renin-Angiotensin SystemTibialis anterior muscleColon SigmoidInternal medicineIntestinal motilitymedicineHumansTibial nerveHuman colonAgedAged 80 and overAngiotensin IIImidazolesAnatomyMiddle AgedAngiotensin IIMotor unitmedicine.anatomical_structureAngiotensin II type 1 receptorCardiologyReflexExcitatory postsynaptic potentialTachykininFemaleAnkleMuscle Contraction

description

We propose and validate a non-invasive method that enables accurate detection of the discharge times of a relatively large number of motor units during excitatory and inhibitory reflex stimulations. HDsEMG and intramuscular EMG (iEMG) were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle during ankle dorsiflexions performed at 5%, 10%, and 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force, in 9 healthy subjects. The tibial nerve (inhibitory reflex) and the peroneal nerve (excitatory reflex) were stimulated with constant current stimuli. In total, 416 motor units were identified from the automatic decomposition of the HDsEMG. The iEMG was decomposed using a state-of-the-art decomposition tool and provided 84 motor units (average of two recording sites). The reflex responses of the detected motor units were analyzed using the peri-stimulus time histogram (PSTH) and the peri-stimulus frequencygram (PSF). The reflex responses of the common motor units identified concurrently from the HDsEMG and the iEMG signals showed an average disagreement (the difference between number of observed spikes in each bin relative to the mean) of 8.2±2.2% (5% MVC), 6.8±1.0% (10% MVC), and 7.5±2.2% (20% MVC), for reflex inhibition, and 6.5±4.1%, 12.0±1.8%, 13.9±2.4%, for reflex excitation. There was no significant difference between the characteristics of the reflex responses, such as latency, amplitude and duration, for the motor units identified by both techniques. Finally, reflex responses could be identified at higher force (four of the nine subjects performed contraction up to 50% MVC) using HDsEMG but not iEMG, because of the difficulty in decomposing the iEMG at high forces. In conclusion, single motor unit reflex responses can be estimated accurately and non-invasively in relatively large populations of motor units using HDsEMG. This non-invasive approach may enable a more thorough investigation of the synaptic input distribution on active motor units at various force levels.

10.1111/apha.12538https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26052867