6533b82ffe1ef96bd1295d04
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A Review of Multiple Try MCMC algorithms for Signal Processing
Luca MartinoLuca Martinosubject
FOS: Computer and information sciencesComputer scienceMonte Carlo methodMachine Learning (stat.ML)02 engineering and technologyMultiple-try MetropolisBayesian inference01 natural sciencesStatistics - Computation010104 statistics & probabilitysymbols.namesakeArtificial IntelligenceStatistics - Machine Learning0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering0101 mathematicsElectrical and Electronic EngineeringComputation (stat.CO)Signal processingMarkov chainApplied MathematicsEstimator020206 networking & telecommunicationsMarkov chain Monte CarloStatistics::ComputationComputational Theory and MathematicsSignal ProcessingsymbolsSample spaceComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionStatistics Probability and UncertaintyAlgorithmdescription
Many applications in signal processing require the estimation of some parameters of interest given a set of observed data. More specifically, Bayesian inference needs the computation of {\it a-posteriori} estimators which are often expressed as complicated multi-dimensional integrals. Unfortunately, analytical expressions for these estimators cannot be found in most real-world applications, and Monte Carlo methods are the only feasible approach. A very powerful class of Monte Carlo techniques is formed by the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. They generate a Markov chain such that its stationary distribution coincides with the target posterior density. In this work, we perform a thorough review of MCMC methods using multiple candidates in order to select the next state of the chain, at each iteration. With respect to the classical Metropolis-Hastings method, the use of multiple try techniques foster the exploration of the sample space. We present different Multiple Try Metropolis schemes, Ensemble MCMC methods, Particle Metropolis-Hastings algorithms and the Delayed Rejection Metropolis technique. We highlight limitations, benefits, connections and differences among the different methods, and compare them by numerical simulations.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-01-27 |