6533b82ffe1ef96bd1295d7b
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study
Ramanpreet SinghJagjit SinghRamandeep Singh GambhirSonia NandaRina Singhsubject
business.industryRetraction cordResearchtechnology industry and agricultureTooth surfaceOdontologíamacromolecular substances:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Ciencias de la saludImpressionPolyvinyl siloxaneUntreated controlClinical and Experimental DentistryUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASMedicineComposite materialbusinessGeneral Dentistrydescription
Objective:To determine the effect of different retraction cord medicaments on surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials and compare this effect on any two brands of commercially available polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Material and methods: Four stainless steel dies were made according to ADA specification no.19. Three dies were treated with aluminium chloride (5%), ferric sulphate (13.3%) and epinephrine (0.1%) while the fourth one was left untreated to serve as control. Two impression materials (Dentsply and 3M ESPE) were used. Results: All the three medicaments adversely affected the surface detail reproduction of both the brands of the polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. These effects were statistically significant as compared to untreated control. The impressions of 3M ESPE brand have shown better surface detail reproduction as compared to Dentsply impression material. Conclusion: Surface detail reproduction of the polyvinyl siloxane impression materials is adversely affected by the retraction cord medicaments. The presence of moisture or any traces of the medicaments should be removed from the tooth surface to provide a dry field for the correct reproduction of the surface detail of these materials. Key words:Polyvinyl Siloxane, retraction cord medicaments, surface detail reproduction.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013-07-01 | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry |