6533b830fe1ef96bd129684d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Load Distribution in the Lumbar Spine During Modeled Compression Depends on Lordosis.

Andreas MüllerAndreas MüllerAndreas MüllerRobert RockenfellerNicolas DammMichael KosterhonSven R. KantelhardtAmeet K. AiyangarAmeet K. AiyangarKarin GruberKarin Gruber

subject

musculoskeletal diseasesHistologyLordosis0206 medical engineeringBiomedical EngineeringBioengineering02 engineering and technologyScoliosisbiomechanicsFacet joint03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineLumbarCobb anglemedicineOriginal ResearchOrthodonticsbusiness.industryBioengineering and Biotechnologylumbar lordosisCompression (physics)Sacrummedicine.disease020601 biomedical engineeringSpondylolisthesisVertebramedicine.anatomical_structureMBS modelcurvaturemusculo skeletal modelforward dynamicsbusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryTP248.13-248.65Biotechnology

description

Excessive or incorrect loading of lumbar spinal structures is commonly assumed as one of the factors to accelerate degenerative processes, which may lead to lower back pain. Accordingly, the mechanics of the spine under medical conditions, such as scoliosis or spondylolisthesis, is well-investigated. Treatments via both conventional therapy and surgical methods alike aim at restoring a “healthy” (or at least pain-free) load distribution. Yet, surprisingly little is known about the inter-subject variability of load bearings within a “healthy” lumbar spine. Hence, we utilized computer tomography data from 28 trauma-room patients, whose lumbar spines showed no visible sign of degeneration, to construct simplified multi-body simulation models. The subject-specific geometries, measured by the corresponding lumbar lordosis (LL) between the endplates of vertebra L1 and the sacrum, served as ceteris paribus condition in a standardized forward dynamic compression procedure. Further, the influence of stimulating muscles from the M. multifidus group was assessed. For the range of available LL from 28 to 66°, changes in compressive and shear forces, bending moments, as well as facet joint forces between adjacent vertebrae were calculated. While compressive forces tended to decrease with increasing LL, facet forces were tendentiously increasing. Shear forces decreased between more cranial vertebrae and increased between more caudal ones, while bending moments remained constant. Our results suggest that there exist significant, LL-dependent variations in the loading of “healthy” spinal structures, which should be considered when striving for individually appropriate therapeutic measures.

10.3389/fbioe.2021.661258https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34178959