6533b830fe1ef96bd1296879

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Escala de Percepción de Promoción del Bienestar para Entrenadores (EPPBE): Análisis inicial de sus propiedades psicométricas y validez. (Perception of Well-being Promotion for Coaches’ Scale (EPPBE): Initial analysis of psychometrics properties and validity).

subject

description

Este estudio analizo las propiedades psicometricas de la Escala de Percepcion de Promocion del Bienestar para Entrenadores (EPPBE), compuesta por 6 dimensiones: Autocontrol, castigo, apoyo social, apoyo a la autonomia, apoyo a la competencia y apoyo a la afiliacion. Se administro la escala a 506 entrenadores y se realizo un analisis factorial confirmatorio. La validez nomologica se analizo a traves de las relaciones de las variables con la satisfaccion de necesidades basicas y la motivacion autodeterminada. El modelo mostro un ajuste adecuado a los datos. El castigo percibido no correlaciono con el resto de variables de la escala, que si mostraron correlaciones positivas entre ellas, hasta el punto de que el apoyo a la competencia y autonomia fueron escasamente diferenciadas, mostrando una correlacion muy alta. Se verificaron relaciones positivas de todas las variables, excepto el castigo, con la satisfaccion de necesidades y la motivacion autodeterminada, siendo negativa solo en el caso del castigo. El castigo solo se relaciono negativamente con la motivacion autodeterminada. Estas relaciones apoyaron los postulados de la Teoria de la Autodeterminacion y los estudios realizados en atletas. Como conclusion, la escala EPPBE mostro propiedades psicometricas y validez adecuadas para utilizarla como instrumento de medida. Palabras clave : bienestar psicologico; necesidades basicas; autodeterminacion; validez. Abstract This study analysed the psychometric properties of the Perception of Well-being Promotion for Coaches’ Scale (EPPBE), which was composed by 6 dimensions: Self-control, punishment, social support, autonomy support, competence support, and relatedness support. The scale was administered to a sample of 506 coaches and a Confirmatory Factorial Analysis was performed. Nomologic validity was analysed by the relationships with psychological need satisfaction and self-determined motivation. The model showed an adequate adjustment to the data. Punishment did not correlate with the other variables, which where positively related between them, competence and autonomy support showing a very high correlation. All dimensions with the exception of perceived punishment were positively related with need satisfaction and self-determined motivation. Punishment only was negatively related with self-determined motivation. Reported relationships supported postulates of Self-determination Theory and studies performed with athletes. As conclusion, the scale EPPBE showed good psychometric properties and adequate validity to be used as measurement tool. Key words : psychological well-being; basic needs; self-determination; validity. doi:10.5232/ricyde2011.02605 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Referencias/references Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 PMid:2320703 Bentler, P.M., & Bonnet, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 Bollen, K.A. (1989). A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 3, 303-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004 Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985a). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6 Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life´s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 Deci, E.L.; Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta-analytic reviews of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 PMid:10589297 Edmunds, J.; Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2006). A test of self-determination theory in the exercise domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2240-2265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00102.x Gagne, M.; Ryan, R.M., & Bargmann, K. (2003): Autonomy Support and Need Satisfaction in the Motivation and Well-Being of Gymnasts, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15:4, 372-390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714044203 Gould, D.; Finch, L.M., & Jackson, S.A. (1993). Coping strategies utilized by national champion figure skaters. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64 (1), 83-93. PMid:8451537 Lonsdale, C.; Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2008). The behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire: instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 323-355. PMid:18648109 Mouratidis, A.; Vansteenkiste, M.; Lens, W., & Sideridis, G. (2008). The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: evidence for a motivational model. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 240-268 PMid:18490793 Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.444 Pittman, R. S.; Davey, M. E.; Alafat, K. A.; Wetherill, K. V., & Kramer, N. A. (1980). Informational versus controlling verbal rewards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 228-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616728062007 Reinboth, M.; Duda, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 297-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040156.81924.b8 Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450 Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 PMid:2810024 Sarrazin, P.; Vallerand, R.; Guillet, E.; Pelletier, L., & Cury, F. (2002). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 395-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.98 Standage, M.; Duda, J.L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). Predicting motivational regulations in physical education: the interplay between dispositional goal orientations, motivational climate and perceived competence. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 631-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000101962 PMid:12875314 Sundgot-Borgen, J., & Torstveit, M.K. (2004). Prevalence of eating disorders in elite athletes is higher than in the general population. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 14, 25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200401000-00005 PMid:14712163 Vallerand, R.J., & Losier, G.F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956 -------------------------------------------------------------------