6533b831fe1ef96bd129851b

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Clinical practice format for choosing a second-line disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis after failure of 6 months' first-line DMARD therapy.

Olivier MeyerMichel De BandtJean-marie BerthelotAlain CantagrelBernard CombeBruno FautrelRené-marc FlipoFrédéric LiotéJean-francis MaillefertAlain SarauxDaniel WendlingFrancis GuilleminXavier Le LoëtNon Renseigné

subject

MESH: Antirheumatic AgentsMESH: Treatment FailureDiseaseReceptors Tumor Necrosis FactorEtanerceptArthritis Rheumatoid0302 clinical medicineMESH: Practice Guidelines as Topic030212 general & internal medicineTreatment Failureskin and connective tissue diseasesMESH: Immunoglobulin GMESH: Arthritis RheumatoidAnti rheumatic drugs3. Good healthClinical PracticeMESH: Methotrexate[SDV.MHEP.RSOA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Rhumatology and musculoskeletal systemRheumatoid arthritisAntirheumatic AgentsPractice Guidelines as TopicDrug Therapy CombinationLeflunomidemusculoskeletal diseasesmedicine.medical_specialtyMESH: Rheumatoid FactorFirst lineMESH: Drug Administration ScheduleDrug Administration ScheduleDecision Support Techniques03 medical and health sciencesRheumatologyRheumatoid FactorDmard therapymedicineRheumatoid factorHumansIntensive care medicine030203 arthritis & rheumatologyMESH: HumansMESH: Sulfasalazinebusiness.industryMESH: Biological MarkersMESH: Decision Support TechniquesEarly rheumatoid arthritisIsoxazolesmedicine.diseaseMESH: Receptors Tumor Necrosis FactorRadiographySulfasalazineMESH: Drug Therapy CombinationMethotrexateMESH: IsoxazolesImmunoglobulin GPhysical therapybusinessBiomarkers

description

International audience; BACKGROUND: The objective was to develop a clinical practice format for choosing a second-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) after a 6-month course of a first-line DMARD in patients with early RA. METHODS: A panel of 34 experts selected treatment option from various scenarios using the Thurstone pairwise method. The experts had to choose between two proposed DMARDs without proposing other options. The scenarios were obtained using the three items: DAS28, rheumatoid factor status and radiographic structural damage. A sample of 240 among 480 scenarios for each expert was taken at random. Responses given by at least 20% of the experts were considered pertinent. RESULTS: Recommendations for choosing a second DMARD for early RA after failure of a 6-month course of a first-line DMARD were established according to 4 parameters: type of first-line DMARD, activity, RF status and radiographic joint damage. The results of this study suggest that in patients with early RA who fail a 6-month course of first-line DMARD therapy, the best options may be addition of corticosteroid when disease activity is moderate to high and switching to a biologic agent when further radiographic joint damage occurs, particularly in patients with positive tests for RF. CONCLUSION: Although our scenarios did not include step-up (add instead of substitute) strategies, except for corticosteroids, we feel that the format presented here can optimise the management of patients with early RA seen in clinical practice.

10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.05.008https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17194614