6533b831fe1ef96bd12986da

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Not all KIT 557/558 codons mutations have the same prognostic influence on recurrence-free survival: breaking the exon 11 mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

Lidia Rita CorsiniMarta CastigliaAntonio GalvanoBruno VincenziE. PedoneNadia BarracoD. CancelliereChiara BrandoAntonio RussoMarco BonoLorena IncorvaiaDaniele FanaleAlessandro PerezDaniela CabibiGiuseppa GraceffaIda De LucaMassimiliano CaniLaura AlgeriViviana BazanGianni PantusoA. PivettiAnnalisa BonaseraA. FiorinoGiuseppe Badalamenti

subject

KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinaseGiSTbusiness.industryplatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaPlatelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor AlphaNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensmedicine.diseasegastrointestinal stromal tumorExon557/558 deletionOncologyRecurrence free survivalGenotypeCancer researchmedicinePrognostic biomarkerGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)Stromal tumorprognostic biomarkerbusinessRC254-282

description

Background: Although the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) genotype is not currently included in risk-stratification systems, a growing body of evidence shows that the pathogenic variant (PV) type and codon location hold a strong prognostic influence on recurrence-free survival (RFS). This information has particular relevance in the adjuvant setting, where an accurate prognostication could help to better identify high-risk tumors and guide clinical decision-making. Materials and Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2020, 96 patients with completely resected GISTs harboring a KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase ( KIT) exon 11 PV were included in the study. We analyzed the type and codon location of the PV according to clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcome; the metastatic sites in relapsed patients were also investigated. Results: Tumors harboring a KIT exon 11 deletion or deletion/insertion involving the 557 and/or 558 codons, showed a more aggressive clinical behavior compared with tumors carrying deletion/deletion/insertion in other codons, or tumors with duplication/insertion/single-nucleotide variant (SNV) (7-year RFS: 50% versus 73.1% versus 88.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). Notably, among 18 relapsed patients with 557 and/or 558 deletion or deletion/insertion, 14 patients (77.8%) harbored deletions simultaneously involving 557 and 558 codons, while only 4 patients (22.2%) harbored deletions involving only 1 of the 557/558 codons. Thus, when 557 or 558 deletions occurred separately, the tumor showed a prognostic behavior similar to the GIST carrying deletions outside the 557/558 position. Remarkably, patients with GISTs stratified as intermediate risk, but carrying the 557/558 deletion, showed a similar outcome to the high-risk patients with tumors harboring deletions in codons other than 557/558, or duplication/insertion/SNV. Conclusion: Our data support the inclusion of the PV type and codon location in routine risk prediction models, and suggest that intermediate-risk patients whose GISTs harbor 557/558 deletions may also need to be treated with adjuvant imatinib like the high-risk patients.

https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359211049779