6533b832fe1ef96bd129a17e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparison of computational and experimental saturation vapor pressures of α-pinene + O<sub>3</sub> oxidation products

Taina Yli-juutiNoora HyttinenNoora HyttinenIida PullinenAnnele VirtanenAki NissinenSiegfried Schobesberger

subject

OzonolysisMaterials scienceMolar mass010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesThermal decompositionAnalytical chemistryThermal desorptioncomplex mixtures01 natural sciencesAerosolOrders of magnitude (specific energy)13. Climate actionMoleculeSaturation (chemistry)0105 earth and related environmental sciences

description

Abstract. Accurate information on gas-to-particle partitioning is needed to model secondary organic aerosol formation. However, determining reliable saturation vapor pressures of atmospherically relevant multifunctional organic compounds is extremely difficult. We estimated saturation vapor pressures of α-pinene ozonolysis derived secondary organic aerosol constituents using FIGAERO-CIMS experiments and COSMO-RS theory. We found a good agreement between experimental and computational saturation vapor pressures for molecules with molar masses around 190 g mol−1 and higher, most within a factor of 3 comparing the average of the experimental vapor pressures and the COSMO-RS estimate of the isomer closest to the experiments. Smaller molecules likely have saturation vapor pressures that are too high to be measured using our experimental setup. The molecules with molar masses below 190 g mol−1 that have several orders of magnitude difference between the computational and experimental saturation vapor pressures observed in our experiments are likely products of thermal decomposition occurring during thermal desorption. For example, dehydration and decarboxylation reactions are able to explain some of the discrepancies between measured and calculated saturation vapor pressures. Based on our estimates, FIGAERO-CIMS can best be used to determine saturation vapor pressures of compounds with low and extremely low volatilities.

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-775