6533b832fe1ef96bd129a568
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Memorializing mass deaths at the border: two cases from Canberra (Australia) and Lampedusa (Italy)
Karina HorstiKlaus Neumannsubject
ta520Cultural StudiesMemorializationHistorySociology and Political ScienceRefugeemedia_common.quotation_subjectrajat0507 social and economic geographyPoison controlbordersmigrationSuicide preventionOccupational safety and healthpakolaisuusmaahanmuuttoInjury preventionborder-related deaths050602 political science & public administrationmuistaminenLampedusamedia_commonhautamuistomerkitmemorializationbiology05 social scienceskuolemarefugeesbiology.organism_classification0506 political scienceAnthropologymemorialsEthnologyGriefpakolaiset050703 geographydescription
In this paper, we compare two seemingly very similar instances in which individuals and organizations within the borders of the global North have memorialized the deaths of irregular migrants at sea: the SIEV X memorial in Australia’s national capital Canberra, and the Giardino della memoria (Garden of Remembrance) on the Italian island of Lampedusa. Unlike ephemeral manifestations of grief, potentially these memorials have effects that reach well beyond their creation. We relate the differences between the memorials to the contexts within which they were created: an immediate local response involving people directly affected by the disaster’s aftermath, on the one hand, and a delayed nation-wide response involving people removed from the deaths at sea, on the other. We also discuss the difference between a memorial that names and thereby individualizes victims, and one that does not, and between one that celebrates an alternative, hospitable society, and one that does not. peerReviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-11-15 | Ethnic and Racial Studies |