6533b832fe1ef96bd129afac

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Self-rated health and mortality: Could clinical and performance-based measures of health and functioning explain the association?

Tiina-mari LyyraMarja JylhäAnna-liisa LyyraEino Heikkinen

subject

AdultMaleSelf-assessmentGerontologySelf-AssessmentAgingHealth (social science)Activities of daily livingHealth StatusCognitionActivities of Daily LivingHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMedicineMortalityProspective cohort studySurvival rateFinlandAgedProportional Hazards ModelsSelf-rated healthAnthropometryHand Strengthbusiness.industryProportional hazards modelMiddle AgedAnthropometrySurvival RateChronic DiseasePredictive powerFemaleGeriatrics and GerontologybusinessGerontologyPsychomotor Performance

description

It is well established that self-rated health (SRH) predicts mortality even when other indicators of health status are taken into account. It has been suggested that SRH measures a wide array of mortality-related physiological and pathological characteristics not captured by the covariates included in the analyses. Our aim was to test this hypothesis by examining the predictive value of SRH on mortality controlling for different measurements of body structure, performance-based functioning and diagnosed diseases with a population-based, prospective study over an 18-year follow-up. Subjects consisted of 257 male residents of the city of Jyväskylä, central Finland, aged 51-55 and 71-75 years. Among the 71-75-year-olds the association between SRH and mortality was weaker over the longer compared to shorter follow-up period. In the multivariate Cox regression models with an 18-year follow-up time for middle-aged and a10-year follow-up time for older men, SRH predicted mortality even when the anthropometrics, clinical chemistry and performance-based measures of functioning were controlled for, but not when the number of chronic diseases was included. Although our results confirm the hypothesis that the predictive value of SRH can be explained by diagnosed diseases, its predictive power remained, when the clinical and performance-based measures of health and functioning were controlled.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2005.08.001