6533b833fe1ef96bd129b8c9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Improving empathy with motivational strategies in batterer intervention programmes: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

ÁNgel Romero-martínezEnrique GraciaLuis Moya-albiolMarisol Lila

subject

AdultMalemedia_common.quotation_subjectEmotionsPsychological interventionPoison control050109 social psychologyEmpathylaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawBehavior TherapyIntervention (counseling)Humans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesmedia_commonMotivationModalities05 social sciencesGeneral MedicineClinical PsychologyProsocial behaviorPhysical AbusePerspective-takingFemaleEmpathyPsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryClinical psychology

description

OBJECTIVES Empathy (i.e., the ability to decode emotions, as well as cognitive and emotional empathy) is involved in moral reasoning, prosocial behaviour, social and emotional adequacy, mood and behaviour regulation. Hence, alterations in these functions could reduce behaviour control and the adoption of specific types of violence such as intimate partner violence (IPV). Although interventions for IPV perpetrators focus on reducing IPV risk factors and increasing protective factors to prevent this kind of violence, the study of the effectiveness of these programmes in promoting changes in empathy (cognitive and emotional) has been neglected. DESIGN Hence, the main aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two different modalities of IPV intervention programmes (Standard Batterer Intervention Programs [SBIP] vs. SBIP + Individualized Motivational Plan [IMP]) in promoting empathic improvements after both interventions. METHOD Participants were randomly assigned to receive SBIP (n = 40) or SBIP + IMP (n = 53). The effectiveness of the intervention in the total sample and the group effects were evaluated with general linear model repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS Results revealed that only the IPV perpetrators who received the SBIP + IMP were more accurate in decoding emotional facial signals and presented better cognitive empathy (perspective taking) after the intervention programme. CONCLUSIONS Our study reinforces the view that different modalities of IPV intervention might lead to different cognitive outcomes after the intervention. Thus, these results may help professionals to develop specific intervention programmes focused on improving cognitive abilities in order to reduce IPV recidivism. PRACTITIONER POINTS Interventions for batterers' neglected empathic changes after these programmes. Not enough randomized controlled trials for these kinds of interventions. An improvement in the ability to decode emotions after the intervention programme. An improvement in cognitive empathy (perspective taking) after the intervention programme. Different modalities of IPV intervention might lead to different cognitive outcomes after the intervention.

10.1111/bjc.12204https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31092542