6533b833fe1ef96bd129c296

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Double-J stent insertion across vesicoureteral junction--is it a valuable initial approach in neonates and infants with severe primary nonrefluxing megaureter?

Marcello CimadorMarco CastagnettiMaria SergioEnrico De Grazia

subject

NephrologyMalemedicine.medical_specialtyMegaureterUrologyUrinary systemmedicine.medical_treatmentUrinary BladderRenal functionUreterInternal medicinemedicineHumansUreteral DiseasesVesico-Ureteral RefluxUrinary bladderbusiness.industryUrinary retentiondouble-J stent megaureter pediatricsInfant NewbornStentInfantUrinary Retentionmedicine.diseaseSurgerymedicine.anatomical_structureUrologic Surgical ProceduresFemaleStentsmedicine.symptomUreterbusiness

description

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the role of double- J stent insertion in perinatally detected primary nonrefluxing megaureters as a method to temporize treatment in patients with impaired renal function or to prevent function loss in patients treated expectantly, but deemed at high risk of deterioration. Methods Two neonates and 8 infants with a ureter greater than 10 mm and an obstructive excretion pattern, including 3 cases with renal function less than 40%, were selected to undergo double- J stent insertion for a 6-month period. Patients underwent surgery if the ureter redilated and the excretion pattern was obstructive at reassessment 3 months after stent removal. Results Stents were placed at a median age of 3 months (range 1 to 6). Open insertion was necessary in 5 cases (50%). Seven patients (70%) developed stent-related complications (five breakthrough urinary infections) requiring early stent removal in 2 (20%). Five patients (50%) underwent surgery at a median age of 14 months (range 13 to 27), including the 3 patients with decreased renal function at presentation. None required ureteral tapering. None experienced any renal function loss with respect to the initial evaluation. Conclusions Double- J stent insertion across the vesicoureteral junction allows for effective internal drainage of primary nonrefluxing megaureters, but at the cost of a 70% morbidity rate and various technical drawbacks. Therefore, stenting should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The procedure seems valuable to temporize surgery in patients with decreased renal function. However, given the associated morbidity, it seems impractical for patients with preserved function selected in accordance with currently available prognostic indicators.

10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.052https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17070371