6533b833fe1ef96bd129c2a9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Short-Term Precision Error of Bone Strain Index, a New DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Software for Assessing Hip Strength

Silvia TortoraGianpaolo ArenaMarzia AcquasantaLuca RinaudoCarmelo MessinaFabio Massimo UlivieriLuca Maria SconfienzaDomenico Albano

subject

Malemusculoskeletal diseases0301 basic medicineEndocrinology Diabetes and MetabolismCoefficient of variationFinite Element Analysis030209 endocrinology & metabolismPatient PositioningImaging phantom03 medical and health sciencesAbsorptiometry Photon0302 clinical medicineBone DensitymedicineHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingOrthopedics and Sports MedicineFemurFemurDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryAgedFemoral neckBone mineralReproducibilitymedicine.diagnostic_testPhantoms Imagingbusiness.industryReproducibility of Resultsbacterial infections and mycosesmedicine.anatomical_structureOsteoporosisFemale030101 anatomy & morphologyDensitometrybusinessNuclear medicinehuman activitiesSoftware

description

Abstract Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new finite element analysis tool applied to hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term precision error of BSI on the proximal femur, both on a phantom and patients. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines were followed for short-term precision error assessment. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements were performed on an anthropomorphic femur phantom that was scanned twice for 30 times, for a total of 60 scans. For the in vivo part, 30 subjects were scanned twice. BSI precision error was compared to that of bone mineral density (BMD). Both for the phantom and the in vivo study BSI reproducibility was lower compared to that of BMD, as the precision error of BSI resulted 3 times higher compared to that BMD. For phantom measurements, the highest precision value was that of total femur (TF) BMD (coefficient of variation [CoV] = 0.63%, reproducibility = 98.24%), while the lowest precision was the femoral neck (FN) BSI (CoV = 3.08%, reproducibility = 91.48%). Similarly, for the in vivo study, the highest precision was found at TF BMD (CoV = 1.36%, reproducibility = 96.22%), while the lowest value of precision was found for FN BSI (CoV = 4.17%, reproducibility = 88.46%). Reproducibility at TF was always better compared to that of the FN. BSI precision error was about 3 times higher compared to BMD, confirming previous results of lumbar spine BSI. The main source of variability of this new software is related to patient positioning.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2020.10.013