6533b833fe1ef96bd129ca03

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Técnicas reconstructivas tras amputación abdominoperineal extraelevadora del recto o exenteración pélvica: mallas, plastias y colgajos

Flor-lorente BlasMatteo FrassonOmar Carreño

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyPreoperative radiotherapybusiness.industryLength of hospitalizationSacrumSurgeryResectionmedicine.anatomical_structurePerineal woundVaginamedicineSurgeryRectal resectionRectus abdominis flapbusiness

description

Perineal wound complications after abdomino-perineal rectal resection are frequent and clinically relevant for their impact on the length of hospitalization, costs, patients' quality of life and oncologic results. With the diffusion of the preoperative radiotherapy and the gradual shift to the extra-elevator technique, the perineal morbidity rate has increased. Many series describing different techniques of primary closure of the perineal defect have been published, but high-quality clinical studies, indicating which is the best option, are missing. A biologic mesh, associated if possible to an omentoplasty, seems to be sufficient to close the perineal defect after extra-elevator abdomino-perineal rectal resection. However, when the proctectomy is associated to the resection of other organs, as for example vagina or sacrum, resulting in an ample perineal defect, the vertical rectus abdominis flap seems to be the best option. If the perineal defect is smaller, the gracilis or gluteus flaps could be other valid alternatives.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-739x(14)70008-9