6533b834fe1ef96bd129cb62

RESEARCH PRODUCT

How to fight multiple enemies : target-specific chemical defences in an aposematic moth

Kaisa SuistoJohanna MappesMichael MaczkaEmily Burdfield-steelBibiana RojasHannu PakkanenStefan Schulz

subject

0106 biological sciences0301 basic medicineColorAposematismBiologyMoths010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologyPredationBirds03 medical and health sciencesSpecies SpecificityAnimalsaposematismta116General Environmental ScienceGeneral Immunology and MicrobiologyEcologyEcologyAntsfungipredator–prey interactionschemical defencesGeneral MedicinepyrazinesBiological EvolutionBody Fluids030104 developmental biologyPredatory Behaviorta1181General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

description

Animals have evolved different defensive strategies to survive predation, among which chemical defences are particularly widespread and diverse. Here we investigate the function of chemical defence diversity, hypothesizing that such diversity has evolved as a response to multiple enemies. The aposematic wood tiger moth (Arctia plantaginis) displays conspicuous hindwing coloration and secretes distinct defensive fluids from its thoracic glands and abdomen. We presented the two defensive fluids from laboratory-reared moths to two biologically relevant predators, birds and ants, and measured their reaction in controlled bioassays (no information on colour was provided). We found that defensive fluids are target-specific: thoracic fluids, and particularly 2-sec-butyl-3-methoxypyrazine, which they contain, deterred birds, but caused no aversive response in ants. By contrast, abdominal fluids were particularly deterrent to ants, while birds did not find them repellent. Our study, to our knowledge, is the first to show evidence of a single species producing separate chemical defences targeted to different predator types, highlighting the importance of taking into account complex predator communities in studies on the evolution of prey defence diversity.

10.1098/rspb.2017.1424http://juuli.fi/Record/0285054217