6533b834fe1ef96bd129e0f6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Fixed versus Growth Mindset Does not Seem to Matter Much

Ville TirronenAntti-juhani Kaijanaho

subject

entity theorymedia_common.quotation_subjecteducationmindsets050109 social psychologyContext (language use)MindsetpsychologyoppimistuloksetBachelorOddsoppimiskäsityksetMathematics educationta5160501 psychology and cognitive sciencesincremental theorykorkeakoulupedagogiikkata515media_commonImplicit personality theoryta113implicit theories05 social sciencesgrowth mindset050301 educationoppimispsykologiaConfidence intervalfixed mindsetpsykologiaObservational studyOrdered logit0503 education

description

Psychology predicts that a student’s mindset—their implicit theory of intelligence—has an effect on their academic performance. We attempted to corroborate this in the computer science education context by asking the students on two bachelor-level courses, typically taken in the third year of studies, to fill out a standard mindset questionnaire, and analyzing their answers in relation to their grades on those courses. In a sample of 133 students, with only 24 (18 %) students with a clear fixed mindset, there is no detectable correlation between the students’ mindsets and their course grades. An ordinal logistic regression estimates, at the 95 % confidence level, a statistically nonsignificant effect between a decrease by a factor of 0.46 and an increase by a factor of 2.03 in the odds of achieving a better course grade when moving from a strong fixed mindset to neutral mindset, or when moving from a moderate fixed mindset to a moderate growth mindset. This suggests that any effect the mindset has on the outcomes of these courses is small. We conclude that educational interventions targeting students’ mindsets may not be worth the effort in late bachelor-level CS education, possibly because students who suffer from their fixed mindset have already dropped out by the third year. peerReviewed

https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230982