6533b834fe1ef96bd129e25c

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Exploring the Background: Puzzles, Afterthoughts, and Replies

Bruno Celano

subject

ArgumentativeSettore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPhilosophyprojectibility (induction)Rule followingkonvencijaSocial dimensionEpistemologyobičajConventionconvention custom rule-following projectibility (induction) the Background of intentionalityFragment (logic)conventionupoštevanje pravilOzadje intencionalnosticustomNormativerule-followingPhilosophy of lawthe Background of intentionalityLawprojiciranje (indukcija)Constitutional theory

description

In this paper I review the comments, and reply to the objections, put forward in the commentaries to my essay “Pre-conventions. A fragment of the Background”, published in issues n. 30 and 33 of Revus – Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law. My remarks fall under the following headings: 1. The social dimension of pre-conventions; 2. Pre-conventions and ordinary habits and dispositions; 3. Whether my examples are mistaken; 4. Reasons and causes; 5. Normative facts; 6. Whether abstract entities can be causes; 7. Are pre-conventions conditions of Lewis-conventions? 8. What can pre-conventions do for legal theory? 9. Whether I discharged my argumentative burdens. Raziskovanje Ozadja: zagonetke, nakdnadni razmisleki in odgovori. V tem zapisu avtor preuči komentarje in odgovori na kritike, naslovljene na njegovo besedilo Pred-konvencije. Fragment Ozadja, objavljene v številkah 30 in 33 Revije za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava - Revus. Svoje odgovore razdeli na naslednje sklope: 1. Družbena razsežnost pred-konvencij; 2. Pred-konvencije ter običajne navade in nagnjenja; 3. Ali so njegovi primeri napačni; 4. Razlogi in vzroki; 5. Normativna dejstva; 6. Ali so lahko abstraktne entitete vzroki; 7. Ali so pred-kovencije pogoj Lewis-konvencij?; 8. Kako so lahko pred-konvencije koristne za pravno teorijo?; 9. Ali se uspešno razbremeni argumentativnega bremena.

10.4000/revus.3876http://hdl.handle.net/10447/279083