6533b835fe1ef96bd129f4ea
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Review & meta-analysis: isopropanolic black cohosh extract iCR for menopausal symptoms - an update on the evidence
Camil Castelo-brancoM GambaccianiDominik RachońM. J. MinkinH.-h. Henneicke-von ZepelinAntonio CanoS. PickartzA.-m. BeerXiangyan RuanJ. Schnitkersubject
Cimicifugaanimal diseasesBlack cohosh030209 endocrinology & metabolismRessenyes sistemàtiques (Investigació mèdica)2-Propanol03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineActaea racemosaSystematic reviews (Medical research)HumansMedicineFitoteràpia030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicinebiologyTraditional medicinePlant Extractsbusiness.industryCimicifuga racemosaObstetrics and Gynecologyvirus diseasesGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedbiology.organism_classificationTreatment OutcomeBlack Cohosh ExtractMeta-analysisHot FlashesFemaleMenopausebusinessCimicifuga racemosa extractSystematic searchMenopausaPhytotherapydescription
A systematic literature search revealed 35 clinical studies and one meta-analysis comprising 43,759 women, of which 13,096 were treated with isopropanolic Cimicifuga racemosa extract (iCR). Compared to placebo, iCR was significantly superior for treating neurovegetative and psychological menopausal symptoms, with a standardized mean difference of 0.694 in favor of iCR (p<0.0001). Effect sizes were larger when higher dosages of iCR as monotherapy or in combination with St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum [HP]) were given ( 1.020 and 0.999, respectively), suggesting a dose-depend- ency. For psychological symptoms, the iCRþHP combination was superior to iCR monotherapy. Efficacy of iCR was comparable to low-dose transdermal estradiol or tibolone. Yet, due to its better tol- erability, iCR had a significantly better benefit-risk profile than tibolone. Treatment with iCR/iCRþHP was well tolerated with few minor adverse events, with a frequency comparable to placebo. The clin- ical data did not reveal any evidence of hepatotoxicity. Hormone levels remained unchanged and estrogen-sensitive tissues (e.g. breast, endometrium) were unaffected by iCR treatment. As benefits clearly outweigh risks, iCR/iCRþHP should be recommended as an evidence-based treatment option for natural climacteric symptoms. With its good safety profile in general and at estrogen-sensitive organs, iCR as a non-hormonal herbal therapy can also be used in patients with hormone-dependent diseases who suffer from iatrogenic climacteric symptoms.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-10-06 |