6533b835fe1ef96bd12a004d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effects of progressive resistance exercise in akinetic-rigid Parkinson's disease patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Miguel Fernández-del-olmoOscar E. SumanOscar E. SumanMiguel Blanco-trabaXurxo Dopico-calvoAlejandro LuciaMiguel Del-valleKristian WingeEliseo Iglesias-solerJavier Fernández-ríoBeatriz Barragán-pérezLucía González-gómezVicente Rodríguez-pérezJavier Rodríguez-gómezLuis SantosVicente González-díez

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyMovement disordersParkinson's diseasemedicine.medical_treatmentCondición física - EjerciciosPopulationEnfermedad del sistema nerviosoPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationRisk Assessmentlaw.invention03 medical and health sciencesTratamiento médico0302 clinical medicineRhythmPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRandomized controlled triallawRating scaleReference ValuesMedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineeducationGaitPostural BalanceAgededucation.field_of_studyRehabilitationbusiness.industryRehabilitationPosturographyParkinson DiseaseResistance TrainingDeporteMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseExercise TherapyTreatment OutcomeEnfermedad de ParkinsonSpainPhysical therapyParkinson’s diseaseFemalemedicine.symptombusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryFollow-Up Studies

description

Progressive resistance exercise (PRE) can have a positive effect in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the effect of PRE may vary with the clinical subtype of PD. To date, no study has assessed the effects of PRE in the different subtypes of PD. AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of PRE in PD patients with akinesia and rigidity (AR-subtype). DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. SETTING: Outpatients clinics of the Bierzo Parkinson Association (Ponferrada, Spain) and the Asturias Parkinson Association (Oviedo, Spain). POPULATION: Twenty-eight patients with AR-subtype PD were randomized into an Experimental Group (EG, N.=13) and Control Group (CG, N.=15). METHODS: Static posturography (Centre of Pressure -CoP- parameters), gait (the Ten-Meter Walk Test [TMWT]), freezing of gait (the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire [FOG-Q]), the motor portion of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and patient-perceived quality of life (the 39-item Parkinson’s disease Questionnaire [PDQ39]), were assessed at pre-test, post-test, and re-test. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) (Borg >6-20 Scale) were recorded at the end of each PRE training session. RESULTS: The EG displayed significant ameliorations in Length (CoP parameters) from pre- to post-test (P=0.048), in speed of fast rhythm walking (TMWT) from pre- to post-test (P=0.000), and from pre- to re-test (P=0.027), and in the PDQ39 Score from pre- to post-test (P=0.024). No significant differences were detected in Area or Speed (CoP parameters), speed of preferred rhythm walking (TMWT), FOG-Q scores, or the motor portion of the MDS-UPDRS scores. The EG reported a mean RPE of 9.95 (between “very light” and “fairly light”) for the whole training program. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for the use of PRE training in the rehabilitation of individuals with AR-subtype PD, as it can improve static posturography, gait, and quality of life. Furthermore, RPE scores showed that individuals with AR-subtype PD consider that PRE training require only light efforts. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The PRE training can be a helpful and fruitful rehabilitation tool for AR-subtype PD patients. Sin financiación 2.208 JCR (2017) Q1, 15/65 Rehabilitation 0.754 SJR (2017) Q1, 31/125 Rehabilitation; Q2, 53/201 Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation No data IDR 2017 UEM

10.23736/s1973-9087.17.04572-5https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28290191