6533b836fe1ef96bd12a1465

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation Exercise Training Alters the Relationship Between Spinal Cord Injury Level and Aerobic Capacity

J. Andrew TaylorLeslie R. MorseGaëll DeleyMeghan F. PronovostAidan PorterGlen Picard

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyAnaerobic ThresholdStrength trainingmedicine.medical_treatmenteducationElectric Stimulation TherapyPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationThoracic VertebraeArticleYoung AdultPhysical medicine and rehabilitationHumansFunctional electrical stimulationMedicineLongitudinal StudiesExerciseSpinal cord injurySpinal Cord InjuriesAerobic capacityRehabilitationbusiness.industryRehabilitationMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseCombined Modality TherapyExercise TherapyBreathingPatient ComplianceFemalePulmonary VentilationbusinessAnaerobic exerciseRespiratory minute volumePhysical Conditioning Human

description

Objective To test the hypothesis that hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES) row training would improve aerobic capacity but that it would remain strongly linked to level of spinal cord lesion because of limited maximal ventilation. Design Longitudinal before–after trial of 6 months of FES row training. Setting Exercise for persons with disabilities program in a hospitaL. Participants Volunteers (N=14; age range, 21–63y) with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) (T3-11) who are >2 years postinjury. Intervention Six months of FES row training preceded by a variable period of FES strength training. Main Outcome Measures Peak aerobic capacity and peak exercise ventilation before and after 6 months of FES row training. Results FES row training significantly increased peak aerobic capacity and peak minute ventilation (both P R 2 =.40, P =.009) that was markedly reduced after FES row training (adjusted R 2 =.15, P =.10). In contrast, the relation between level of injury and peak minute ventilation was comparable before and after FES row training (adjusted R 2 =.38 vs .32, both P Conclusions The increased aerobic capacity reflects more than increased ventilation; FES row training effectively circumvents the effect of SCI on peak aerobic capacity by engaging more muscle mass for training, independent of the level of injury.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.412