6533b836fe1ef96bd12a160a
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Three methods for studying developmental change: a case of reading skills and self-concept.
Jari-erik NurmiEsko LeskinenKaisa AunolaTiina Onatsu-arvilommisubject
MalePersonality developmentmedia_common.quotation_subjecteducationSelf-conceptSample (statistics)Models PsychologicalEducationDevelopmental psychologyChild DevelopmentReading (process)Developmental and Educational PsychologyCluster AnalysisHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesSet (psychology)Childmedia_common4. Education05 social sciences050301 educationSelf ConceptTest (assessment)Language developmentReadingScale (social sciences)FemalePsychology0503 education050104 developmental & child psychologydescription
Aims: First, to introduce and compare three statistical methods for investigating development as a cumulative process: a simplex model, latent growth curve analysis, and clustering by cases. Second, to investigate the developmental dynamics of reading skills, and self-concept of reading ability, across the first year of primary school. Sample: One hundred and five (61 boys, 44 girls) 6-to 7-year-old children from four first-grade classes in two primary schools participated in the study. Method: Children were studied three times during their first school year using an identical set of measurements: a Reading Skills Test and the Self-Concept of Ability scale. Results: A uni-construct ‘Matthew’ effect was found for the development of self-concept, but not for the reading skills. However, the results showed that there was a multi-construct cumulative cycle between children's reading skills and their self-concept. Conclusions: Simultaneous use of variable- and person-oriented methods in developmental research seems to be a valuable approach, which not only provides a proper way to investigate the cumulative developmental cycles but also an option to examine how large a proportion of the sample follows the positive and negative pattern found in variable-oriented analyses.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2002-10-25 | The British journal of educational psychology |