6533b837fe1ef96bd12a2723

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The future outlook on allergen immunotherapy in children: 2018 and beyond

Giovanni B. PajnoAlberto VillaniGiovanni CorselloStefania ArasiStefania Arasi

subject

AllergyAllergen immunotherapymedicine.medical_specialtyAllergen-specific immunotherapy; Allergic rhinitis; Allergy; Children; Food allergy; IgE-mediated allergic diseases; Oral immunotherapy; Prevention; Sub-cutaneous immunotherapy; Sub-lingual immunotherapy; Child; Desensitization Immunologic; Food Hypersensitivity; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Pediatrics Perinatology and Child HealthAllergySub-cutaneous immunotherapy610 Medicine & healthDiseaseReviewOral immunotherapyIgE-mediated allergic diseasesAllergic rhinitis03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineQuality of life (healthcare)10183 Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma ResearchFood allergyFood allergyAllergic rhinitimedicineHumans2735 Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health030212 general & internal medicineIntensive care medicineChildChildrenAsthmabusiness.industryPreventionlcsh:RJ1-570lcsh:PediatricsAtopic dermatitisImmunoglobulin Emedicine.diseaseSettore MED/38Allergen-specific immunotherapyRegimen030228 respiratory systemDesensitization ImmunologicIgE-mediated allergic diseasebusinessSub-lingual immunotherapyFood Hypersensitivity

description

Abstract Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only currently available immune-modifying and aetiological treatment for patients suffering from IgE-mediated diseases. In childhood, it represents a suitable therapeutic option to intervene during the early phases of respiratory allergic diseases such as rhino-conjunctivitis and asthma, which is when their progression may be more easily influenced. A growing body of evidence shows that oral immunotherapy represents a promising treatment option in children with persistent IgE- mediated food allergy. The efficacy of AIT is under investigation also in patients with extrinsic atopic dermatitis, currently with controversial results. Furthermore, AIT might be a strategy to prevent the development of a new sensitization or of a (new) allergic disease. However, there are still some methodological criticisms, such as: a) the regimen of administration and the amount of the maintenance dose are both largely variable; b) the protocols of administration are not standardized; c) the description and classification of side effects is variable among studies and needs to be standardized; d) quality of life and evaluation of health economics are overall missing. All these aspects make difficult to compare each study with another. In addition, the content of major allergen(s) remains largely variable among manufacturers and the availability of AIT products differences among countries. The interest and the attention to AIT treatment are currently fervent and increasing. Well-designed studies are awaited in the near future in order to overcome the current gaps in the evidence and furtherly promote implementation strategies.

10.1186/s13052-018-0519-4http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042356