6533b837fe1ef96bd12a3149

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Serum uric acid and outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure through the whole spectrum of ejection fraction phenotypes: Analysis of the ESC-EORP Heart Failure Long-Term (HF LT) Registry

Roberto FerrariLuis Almenar-bonetLars LundAndrea CardonaMassimo F PiepoliAndrew J.s. CoatsAldo P. MaggioniGiuseppe AmbrosioStefano CoiroCécile LarochePentti PoderMarisa Crespo LeiroAnna FrisinghelliStefan D. AnkerGerasimos FilippatosDavid Bierge Valero

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyHeart failure030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyVentricular Function Left03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineInternal medicineInternal MedicinemedicineHumansIn patient030212 general & internal medicineProspective StudiesRegistriesProspective cohort studyRetrospective StudiesInflammationEjection fractionbusiness.industryStroke Volumemedicine.diseasePrognosisClinical trialPhenotypechemistryQuartileHeart failureCohortCardiologyUric acidbusinessUric acid

description

Background: Retrospective analyses of clinical trials indicate that elevated serum uric acid (sUA) predicts poor outcome in heart failure (HF). Uric acid can contribute to inflammation and microvascular dysfunction, which may differently affect different left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) phenotypes. However, role of sUA across LVEF phenotypes is unknown. Objectives: We investigated sUA association with outcome in a prospective cohort of HF patients stratified according to LVEF. Methods: Through the Heart Failure Long-Term Registry of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC-EORP-HFLT), 4,438 outpatients were identified and classified into: reduced (= 50% HFpEF) LVEF. Endpoints were the composite of cardiovascular death/HF hospitalization, and individual components. Results: Median sUA was 6.72 (IQ:5.48-8.20) mg/dl in HFrEF, 6.41 (5.02-7.77) in HFmrEF, and 6.30 (5.20-7.70) in HFpEF. At a median 372-day follow-up, the composite endpoint occurred in 648 (13.1%) patients, with 176 (3.6%) deaths and 538 (10.9%) HF hospitalizations. Compared with lowest sUA quartile (Q), Q-III and Q-IV were significantly associated with the composite endpoint (adjusted HR 1.68: 95% CI 1.11-2.54; 2.46: 95% CI 1.66-3.64, respectively). By univariable analyses, HFrEF and HFmrEF patients in Q-III and Q-IV, and HFpEF patients in Q-IV, showed increased risk for the composite endpoint (P<0.05 for all); after model-adjustment, significant association of sUA with outcome persisted among HFrEF in Q-IV, and HFpEF in Q-III-IV. Conclusions: In a large, contemporary-treated cohort of HF outpatients, sUA is an independent prognosticator of adverse outcome, which can be appreciated in HErEF and HFpEF patients.

https://fundanet.iislafe.san.gva.es/publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=14727