6533b837fe1ef96bd12a3273

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Implementation of augmented reality in operative dentistry learning.

Carmen LlenaLeopoldo FornerS. FolgueraFrancisco Javier Rodríguez-lozano

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyModels Educational020205 medical informaticsWilcoxon signed-rank testTeaching methodeducation02 engineering and technologyJob SatisfactionEducation03 medical and health sciencesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineStatistical significanceDentistry Operative0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringmedicineHumansLearningMedical physicsGeneral DentistryEducation DentalOrthodonticsOperative dentistrybusiness.industryVirtual Reality030206 dentistrySatisfaction questionnaireTest (assessment)Augmented realityFemaleClinical CompetencebusinessDental Cavity Preparation

description

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of augmented reality (AR) in the gaining of knowledge and skills amongst dental students in the design of cavity preparations and analyse their degree of satisfaction. Material and methods AR cavity models were prepared for use with computers and mobile devices. Forty-one students were divided into two groups (traditional teaching methods vs AR). Questionnaires were designed to evaluate knowledge and skills, with the administration of a satisfaction questionnaire for those using AR. The degree of compliance with the standards in cavity design was assessed. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare knowledge and skills between the two groups, and the Wilcoxon test was applied to compare intragroup differences. The chi-square test in turn was used to compare the qualitative parameters of the cavity designs between the groups. Statistical significance was considered for P.05). Although the results corresponding to most of the studied skills parameters were better in the experimental group, significant differences (P<.05) were only founded for cavity depth and extent for Class I and divergence of the buccal and lingual walls for the Class II. The experience was rated as favourable or very favourable by 100% of the participants. The students showed preference for computers (60%) vs mobile devices (10%). Conclusions The AR techniques favoured the gaining of knowledge and skills and were regarded as a useful tool by the students.

10.1111/eje.12269https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28370970