6533b838fe1ef96bd12a46a0

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Students’ Redesign of Mandatory Assignments in Teacher Education

Eli-marie Danbolt DrangeNils Rune BirkelandGro-renée Rambø

subject

Computer sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectMandatory assignmentsacademic textsLiteracydesign for learningoral presentations0502 economics and businessPedagogyComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATIONmedia_commonDigital literacyteacher educationMandatory assignments; teacher education; design for learning; oral presentations; academic texts; teacher studentsInstructional designInterpretation (philosophy)05 social sciencesProfessional development050301 educationTeacher educationPublic speakingteacher studentsLearning development050211 marketinglcsh:L0503 educationlcsh:Education

description

This article explores specific aspects of literacy practices in teacher education in Norway, building upon data collected within the research project Digital literacy and use of learning resources in teacher education in Norway (DigiGLU). Our main aim is to explore how teachers in different subject courses in teacher education (TE) design mandatory assignments, and how students respond to these designs. After the extensive TE-reform in 2010, in revised plans and documents guiding professional training, mandatory assignments (both form and content) were considered more important for the students’ learning process. In our investigation, the concepts of design for learning and design in learning, as described by Selander and Kress (2010), are considered fruitful as theoretical perspectives. The analysis focuses on oral presentations and traditional academic texts in four different TE-subjects. Our main finding, across subjects, is that there seem to be mismatches between the intentions behind the designs on the part of the assignment designers and the actual interpretation: hence the redesigned result by the receiver of the design. The article concludes with some reflections on why these mismatches occur, and what the implications might be for the students’ academic development and the possible transfer of certain literacy practices to their occupational lives.

10.16993/dfl.69http://www.designsforlearning.nu/jms/article/view/dfl.69