6533b839fe1ef96bd12a5c93

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Hierarchical networks of food exchange in the black garden ant Lasius niger

Jean-louis DeneubourgCédric SueurCédric SueurOlivier BlesMartin QuqueAmélie HéraudAnnaëlle BénardFrançois CriscuoloBastien Meunier

subject

0106 biological sciences0301 basic medicinesocial network analysisModularity (biology)Foragingself-organisationsocial network analysesEvolution des espèces01 natural sciencesPhysiologie des invertébrésGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology03 medical and health sciencesSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Autre [q-bio.OT]Betweenness centralityBlack garden antAnimalsinsectsSocial Behaviorsocial evolutionEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematicsnetwork evolutionPrincipal Component AnalysisBehavior AnimalbiologyAntsEthologieEcologyLasiusFeeding Behaviorbiology.organism_classificationEusociality010602 entomology030104 developmental biologySpace-Time ClusteringInsect Science[SDE]Environmental SciencesCentralityBiologieAgronomy and Crop ScienceSocial Network AnalysisTrophallaxis

description

In most eusocial insects, the division of labour results in relatively few individuals foraging for the entire colony. Thus, the survival of the colony depends on its efficiency in meeting the nutritional needs of all its members. Here, we characterise the network topology of a eusocial insect to understand the role and centrality of each caste in this network during the process of food dissemination. We constructed trophallaxis networks from 34 food-exchange experiments in black garden ants (Lasius niger). We tested the influence of brood and colony size on (i) global indices at the network level (i.e. efficiency, resilience, centralisation and modularity) and (ii) individual values (i.e. degree, strength, betweenness and the clustering coefficient). Network resilience, the ratio between global efficiency and centralisation, was stable with colony size but increased in the presence of broods, presumably in response to the nutritional needs of larvae. Individual metrics highlighted the major role of foragers in food dissemination. In addition, a hierarchical clustering analysis suggested that some domestics acted as intermediaries between foragers and other domestics. Networks appeared to be hierarchical rather than random or centralised exclusively around foragers. Finally, our results suggested that networks emerging from social insect interactions can improve group performance and thus colony fitness.

10.1111/1744-7917.12792https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02555281