6533b839fe1ef96bd12a5d02

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA).

Risto P. RoineSalme JärvenpääArja HäkkinenOuti IlvesJan LindahlJussi P. RepoErkki TukiainenHannu Kautiainen

subject

MalevalidityVisual Analog ScalejalkaterätleikkaushoitoRESPONSIVENESSpotilaslähtöisyys0302 clinical medicineInternal consistencyHealth Status IndicatorsOrthopedics and Sports MedicineReliability (statistics)Finlandta316reliabiliteetti030222 orthopedicsOUTCOMESPain Postoperativeta3141Middle Agedmedicine.anatomical_structureFemaleVAS-FAFoot (unit)Adultmedicine.medical_specialtyPsychometricsVisual analogue scalearviointimenetelmätCULTURAL-ADAPTATIONPain03 medical and health sciencesankleEXTREMITY FUNCTIONAL SCALESCOREmedicineQUALITYHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAged030203 arthritis & rheumatologyReproducibilityreliabilitybusiness.industryFootFoot and ankle surgeryReproducibility of ResultsLower Extremity Functional ScaleINSTRUMENTSTranslating3126 Surgery anesthesiology intensive care radiologynilkathoitotuloksetfootvaliditeettiPhysical therapyAnkleAnklebusiness

description

Background: There have previously been no validated foot and ankle-specific patient-reported outcome measures in Finnish. Methods: The Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) was translated and adapted into Finnish. Thereafter, 165 patients who had undergone foot and ankle surgery completed a questionnaire set on two separate occasions. Analyses included testing of floor-ceiling effect, internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity. Results: Minor linguistic differences emerged during the translation. Some structural adjustments were made. The mean (SD) total VAS-FA score was 74 (23). In the three subscales, maximum scores were noted in 2-5% of the responses, and internal consistency ranged from 0.81 to 0.94. Reproducibility was excellent (ICC, 0.97). The total VAS-FA score correlated significantly with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (r = 0.84) and the 15D Mobility dimension (r = 0.79). The VAS-FA loaded on two factors (pain/movement and problems/limitations). Conclusions: The Finnish version of the VAS-FA has high reliability and strong validity. (C) 2017 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Peer reviewed

10.1016/j.fas.2017.05.009https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29409192