6533b839fe1ef96bd12a6619

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity: A Systematic Mapping of Literature

Abigail WiafeEmmanuel Nyarko ObengStephen R. GulliverFelix Nti KorantengIsaac WiafeNana Assyne

subject

Artificial intelligence and cybersecuritycybersecurityGeneral Computer ScienceComputer scienceinformation securitysystematic reviewsprotocols02 engineering and technologyIntrusion detection systemtekoälyComputer securitycomputer.software_genre01 natural sciencesDomain (software engineering)systematic reviewGeneral Materials Sciencekirjallisuuskatsauksettietoturvakyberturvallisuussystemaattiset kirjallisuuskatsauksettietoverkkorikoksetkyberrikollisuusbusiness.industry010401 analytical chemistryGeneral Engineeringartificial intelligence021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology0104 chemical sciencesSupport vector machinekoneoppiminenmachine learningcomputer crimeArtificial intelligencelcsh:Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringSystematic mappingIntrusion prevention system0210 nano-technologybusinesscomputerlcsh:TK1-9971Qualitative research

description

Due to the ever-increasing complexities in cybercrimes, there is the need for cybersecurity methods to be more robust and intelligent. This will make defense mechanisms to be capable of making real-time decisions that can effectively respond to sophisticated attacks. To support this, both researchers and practitioners need to be familiar with current methods of ensuring cybersecurity (CyberSec). In particular, the use of artificial intelligence for combating cybercrimes. However, there is lack of summaries on artificial intelligent methods for combating cybercrimes. To address this knowledge gap, this study sampled 131 articles from two main scholarly databases (ACM digital library and IEEE Xplore). Using a systematic mapping, the articles were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. It was observed that artificial intelligent methods have made remarkable contributions to combating cybercrimes with significant improvement in intrusion detection systems. It was also observed that there is a reduction in computational complexity, model training times and false alarms. However, there is a significant skewness within the domain. Most studies have focused on intrusion detection and prevention systems, and the most dominant technique used was support vector machines. The findings also revealed that majority of the studies were published in two journal outlets. It is therefore suggested that to enhance research in artificial intelligence for CyberSec, researchers need to adopt newer techniques and also publish in other related outlets. peerReviewed

10.1109/access.2020.3013145https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9152956/