6533b839fe1ef96bd12a6e11
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Thomas Hobbes on fear,mimesis,aisthesisand politics
Mikko Jakonensubject
Sociology and Political Sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectMultitudeObject (philosophy)EpistemologyPoliticsHonourState (polity)SovereigntyInstitutionPolitical philosophySociologySocial Sciences (miscellaneous)media_commondescription
Hobbes's theory of fear has two major implications for his political theory. One implication is how men's mutual fear is the source of a commonwealth by institution. The second implication is that sovereign power is the source of fear, and that sovereign power also uses that fear to govern people. These two implications have not been analyzed fully in past studies. In a way, a sovereign captures mutual fear reigning in a multitude and transforming it into a political tool designed for government of the subjects. Possessing the right and power to cause death, a sovereign takes the place of God on earth. A sovereign has certain expectations of citizens: they should obey and honour the sovereign as they obey and honour God. Analyzing Hobbes's concepts of mimesis, aisthesis and honouring reveals how Hobbes aimed to construct a political object, the State, that would effect the whole sense experience of the subject. It shows that Hobbes's political thought is not only a legal political thought, but is based al...
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011-08-01 | Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory |