6533b83afe1ef96bd12a71e6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A multicenter clinical trial on the use of alpha1-antichymotrypsin-prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis

Dietmar SchnorrCarsten StephanPetra StieberKlaus JungStefan A. LoeningAxel SemjonowPeter HammererMarkus GraefenBrigitte BruxHans-joachim LuboldtMichael LeinManfred Ossendorf

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyalpha 1-AntichymotrypsinUrologyProstatic HyperplasiaUrologyEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assayurologic and male genital diseasesStatistics NonparametricProstate cancerProstateMulticenter trialmedicineHumansProtease InhibitorsAlpha1 AntichymotrypsinAgedAged 80 and overGynecologyReceiver operating characteristicbusiness.industryArea under the curveAntibodies MonoclonalProstatic NeoplasmsMiddle AgedProstate-Specific Antigenmedicine.diseaseClinical trialProstate-specific antigenmedicine.anatomical_structureROC CurveOncologybusiness

description

BACKGROUND The aim was to evaluate the clinical performance of alpha1-antichymotrypsin prostate-specific antigen (PSA-ACT) for early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in a multicenter trial. METHODS Three hundred sixty-seven white men with PCa and 290 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with tPSA concentrations between 2 and 20 μg/L were analyzed. The Elecsys system 2010 (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) was used for determination of total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA). The PSA-ACT test was a prototype assay used on the ES system (Roche Diagnostics). RESULTS The median concentrations of tPSA (PCa: 8.43 μg/L vs. BPH: 6.60 μg/L) and PSA-ACT (8.30 μg/L vs. 6.46 μg/L) were significantly different, respectively. The median ratios of fPSA/tPSA (PCa: 12% vs. BPH: 16%) and PSA-ACT/tPSA (98% vs. 95%) were significantly different. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis for discrimination between PCa and BPH (tPSA between 2 and 20 μg/L) was performed with 252 matched pairs and showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the ratio fPSA/tPSA (0.66) was significantly different from tPSA (0.50) and PSA-ACT (0.52). PSA-ACT alone or the ratio PSA-ACT/tPSA (0.56) were not significantly different from tPSA. For tPSA between 4 and 10 μg/L (n = 145 pairs), the AUC of the ratio fPSA/tPSA (0.65) was significantly higher than tPSA (0.50) and PSA-ACT (0.54). Significant differences between tPSA and PSA-ACT or PSA-ACT/tPSA (0.56) were not found. CONCLUSIONS The determination of PSA-ACT as well as the PSA-ACT/tPSA ratio did not improve the diagnostic impact in patients undergoing evaluation for PCa compared to fPSA/tPSA ratio. Prostate 47:77–84, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.1049