6533b83afe1ef96bd12a7805

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Benefits and Side Effects of Bandage Soft Contact Lens Application after LASIK

subject

description

Purpose To evaluate benefits and side effects of bandage soft contact lens (BSCL) insertion after LASIK in relation to patients’ characteristics. Design Prospective, randomized, bicenter comparative investigational trial. Participants One hundred patients (200 eyes) with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism. Methods Each patient underwent consecutive (Marburg, Germany) or simultaneous (Mainz, Germany) bilateral LASIK. At the end of the procedure, the first treated eye received a drop of ofloxacin and dexamethasone, patch, and transparent protective shield for 2 to 4 hours. The fellow eye received in addition a BSCL, soaked in the same eyedrops for 20 to 24 hours. Main Outcome Measures Schirmer II test results, first-day uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and tolerance of contact lens wear (poor, moderate, good) were recorded. Patients’ subjective preference for the BSCL on the first postoperative day was graded as more comfortable than fellow eye, no difference, or less comfortable. Three months after surgery, the corneal flap was photographed in retroillumination for objective evaluation of microstriae. Statistical significance was determined using the Kruskal–Wallis 1-way analysis of variance on ranks test. Results Fifty-four percent of patients felt discomfort in the eye that had the BSCL (contra-BSCL subgroup), whereas 27% enjoyed having a BSCL (pro-BSCL subgroup). The remaining 19% felt no difference. The average Schirmer II value was 16.6 mm (±7.7) in the pro-BSCL subgroup, 14.9 mm (±6.4) in the no difference subgroup, and 12.3 mm (±7.7) in the contra-BSCL subgroup. There was a female preponderance in the contra-BSCL (39:15) and no difference (15:6) subgroups. A preoperative history of poor contact lens tolerance was recorded in 50% of the contra-BSCL subgroup patients; 41%, no difference; and 33%, pro-BSCL. Postoperative parameters such as first-day UCVA, number of eyes with microstriae, folds requiring stretching, or cases of diffuse lamellar keratitis did not differ significantly. Eyes with flap microstriae had a significantly deeper mean ablation (114.5 μm [range, 52–146 μm]) than eyes without any flap abnormalities (75.4 μm [39–120μm]). No significant differences were found between the consecutive and simultaneous groups. Conclusion The majority of patients did not experience better postoperative comfort from the application of a BSCL. Only 27% of patients reported more comfort from postoperative BSCL use. The latter have better tear film characteristics and a history of less difficulty with contact lenses preoperatively. A BSCL does not protect from the occurrence of microstriae.