6533b83afe1ef96bd12a7ae3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers.

Marja CantellPauli RintalaTimo AhonenPiritta AsuntaHelena ViholainenJari WesterholmMarina M. Schoemaker

subject

Male030506 rehabilitationdevelopmental coordination disorderCHILDRENpsychometric propertiesSCREENING INSTRUMENTDevelopmental psychology0302 clinical medicineRATINGSBIFACTORDEFICITSSurveys and QuestionnairesADOLESCENTSDCDta516Orthopedics and Sports Medicineta315ChildMOQ-TReliability (statistics)FinlandGeneral Medicinemotor observation questionnaire for teachersReliabilityMotor Skills DisordersPsychometric propertiesMotor SkillsScreeningFemale0305 other medical scienceMotor learningPsychologyPredictive validityPsychometricsMovementeducationConcurrent validityBiophysicsExperimental and Cognitive PsychologySensitivity and SpecificityValidity03 medical and health sciencesCronbach's alphaDEVELOPMENTAL COORDINATION DISORDERHumansreliabilityReceiver operating characteristicscreeningConstruct validityReproducibility of ResultsPHYSICAL-ACTIVITYROC CurvevaliditeettiCROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATIONObservational studySchool TeachersMEDIATEFactor Analysis Statistical030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Objectives: Observational screening instruments are often used as an effective, economical first step in the identification of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). The aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T-FI).Methods: The psychometric properties were tested using two separate samples (S1: age range 6-12, M 9y 5mo, females 101, males 92; S2: age range 6-9, M 7y 7mo, females 404, males 446). Teachers completed the MOQ-T-Fl in both samples, and in sample 2 teachers' ratings were compared to student's performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2). Internal consistency was investigated by using Cronbach's alpha, predictive validity by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, concurrent validity by correlation analysis, and construct validity by factor analysis.Results: The MOQ-T-FI behaves consistently with its original Dutch version. The internal consistency was excellent (alpha = 0.97). The bifactor model, with one general factor and two specific factors, fit the data significantly better than the first-order model. The concurrent validity with the MABC-2 was moderate (r = 0.37 p <0.001). Sensitivity was 82.5% and specificity 44.5%, respectively.Conclusion: Notwithstanding the low specificity the MOQ-T-FI can be considered as a promising screening tool in the school environment for Finnish children at risk of motor learning problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.006https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28012789