6533b83afe1ef96bd12a7b54

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial

H.c. DienerP.j. GoadsbyM. AshinaM.a. Al-karagholiA. SinclairD. MitsikostasD. MagisP. Pozo-rosichP.i. SieiraM.j.a. LainezC. GaulN. SilverJ. HoffmannJ. MarinE. LieblerM.d. FerrariPremium Study Group

subject

AdultMaleVagus Nerve StimulationMigraine DisordersMigraine prophylaxismedicine.medical_treatmentMedizinlaw.inventionDouble blindvagal activation03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineDouble-Blind MethodEpisodic migraineRandomized controlled triallawHumanspreventive therapyMedicineIn patient030304 developmental biologymigraine prophylaxis0303 health sciencesNeuromodulationbusiness.industryNon invasiveNon-pharmacologic treatmentOriginal ArticlesGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseNeuromodulation (medicine)3. Good healthTreatment OutcomeMigrainenon-pharmacologic treatmentAnesthesiaVagal activationFemaleNeurology (clinical)Preventive therapybusinessRCT030217 neurology & neurosurgeryVagus nerve stimulation

description

Introduction Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) has the potential to prevent migraine days in patients with migraine on the basis of mechanistic rationale and pilot clinical data. Methods This multicentre study included a 4-week run-in period, a 12-week double-blind period of randomised treatment with nVNS or sham, and a 24-week open-label period of nVNS. Patients were to administer two 120-second stimulations bilaterally to the neck three times daily (6–8 hours apart). Results Of 477 enrolled patients, 332 comprised the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Mean reductions in migraine days per month (primary outcome) were 2.26 for nVNS (n = 165; baseline, 7.9 days) and 1.80 for sham (n = 167; baseline, 8.1 days) ( p = 0.15). Results were similar across other outcomes. Upon observation of suboptimal adherence rates, post hoc analysis of patients with ≥ 67% adherence per month demonstrated significant differences between nVNS (n = 138) and sham (n = 140) for outcomes including reduction in migraine days (2.27 vs. 1.53; p = 0.043); therapeutic gains were greater in patients with aura than in those without aura. Most nVNS device-related adverse events were mild and transient, with application site discomfort being the most common. Conclusions Preventive nVNS treatment in episodic migraine was not superior to sham stimulation in the ITT population. The “sham” device inadvertently provided a level of active vagus nerve stimulation. Post hoc analysis showed significant effects of nVNS in treatment-adherent patients. Study identification and registration: PREMIUM; NCT02378844; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02378844

https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419876920