6533b850fe1ef96bd12a85ea

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Automatic detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with ischaemic stroke: better than routine diagnostic workup?

A. MüllerRolf WachterTimo UphausKlaus GröschelMark Weber-krügerSonja GröschelA. Grings

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyParoxysmal atrial fibrillation030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyBrain Ischemiatransitory ischaemic attackCohort StudiesAutomation03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicineAtrial FibrillationIschaemic strokemedicineHumansIn patientProspective Studiescardiovascular diseasesStrokeAgedAged 80 and overstroke unitbusiness.industryCerebral infarctionAtrial fibrillationOriginal ArticlesMiddle Agedcerebral infarctionmedicine.diseasestrokeHolter electrocardiogramConfidence interval3. Good healthHospitalizationNeurologyIschemic Attack TransientCohortElectrocardiography AmbulatoryCardiologyFemaleOriginal ArticleNeurology (clinical)businessAlgorithms030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Background and purpose Prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring after ischaemic stroke increases the diagnostic yield of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF). In order to facilitate the additional workload involved in ECG analysis due to prolonged monitoring times, we investigated the effectiveness of pAF detection with an automated software algorithm (SA) in comparison to the routine staff-based analysis (RA) during standard stroke-unit care. Therefore, patients with acute ischaemic stroke or transitory ischaemic attack presenting with sinus rhythmus on the admission ECG and no history of atrial fibrillation were prospectively included. Methods A 24-h Holter ECG assessment was performed using either RA based on a computer-aided evaluation and subsequent review by a cardiologist or a commercially available automated SA. In the case of discordant results concerning the occurrence of pAF between the two methods, the data underwent an independent external rating. Results Of 809 prospectively enrolled patients, 580 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. pAF was ultimately diagnosed in 3.3% of the cohort (19 patients). SA and RA correctly diagnosed pAF in 17 patients resulting in a comparable diagnostic effectiveness of the analysis methods (sensitivity: SA 89.5% vs. RA 89.5%; specificity: SA 99.3% vs. RA 99.1%; κ, 0.686; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.525–0.847). RA revealed clinically relevant ECG abnormalities in an additional seven patients. Conclusions Although it should not completely replace RA, SA-based evaluation of Holter ECG reaches a high diagnostic effectiveness for the detection of pAF and can be used for a rapid and resource-saving analysis of ECG data to deal with prolonged monitoring times.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13326