6533b851fe1ef96bd12a8bae
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Were Prestigious Independent Directors Responsible for the Subprime Crisis?
Dietmar LeisenPeter L. Swansubject
Incentivemedia_common.quotation_subjectPrestigeEconomicsFinancial systemQuality (business)Subprime crisisShort termismIndependencemedia_commondescription
We study the independence ratio, as well as the prestige, reputational incentives, experience, and financial expertise of independent directors for 767 U.S. banks from 2000 to 2015, to concentrate on causes of the subprime crisis: short-termism, poor monitoring, and excessive risk-taking. We find that higher independence ratios decrease the monitoring quality of the board, increase short-term incentives for the CEO, and promote greater subprime risk-taking. Our results thereby suggest that, while official responses to the subprime crisis claim that banks were not independent enough, rising independence ratios following Enron and Sabanes Oxley were a major contributing cause of the subprime crisis.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-01-01 | SSRN Electronic Journal |